• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 month ago

    When you get arrested in England, you do have a right to remain silent, but it might be used against you. The police will typically say:

    You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court.

    • BombOmOm
      link
      English
      61 month ago

      Yeah, this is a place the US is much further above others. You don’t have to answer police questions and not answering them cannot be used against you. It’s kinda important, because the police are real good at basically tricking you into admitting guilt. Not having to answer questions is an extremely powerful tool that many fail to utilize.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        I’ve never really thought of it as a bad thing. You can still say nothing, or “I want to speak with a lawyer before I answer any questions”.

        I’ve always considered it to be more about a line of questioning at trial. If you’ve invented an alibi, the prosecution can ask you “why are you only coming up with this excuse now but you didn’t at the time?”. You might then have a good reason for this, such as “I didn’t think it was a good idea to answer questions without first consulting a lawyer”.

        The American model of having immunity if you just stay quiet is a bit odd in comparison.

        • @nogooduser
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          I always assumed that it means that if you talk to them and don’t mention the thing that you might rely on later then it could harm your defence but if you just say that you need to speak to a lawyer and say nothing else then that can’t harm your defence.

          I’m not a lawyer though.