You are wrong, in all your paragraphs. And with one exception* in all your statements.
There is no debate here, history has shown you wrong again and again, for thousands of years, in every state, every idea, every example of oppression.
Your take that the The Adjuster was part of some movement is bullshit, he was a lone terrorist for a cause resonating with the public, this is the spark of revolutions. Him not being organised is the opening for this revolution to be quelled before gaining momentum.
*The only statement of yours I’m willing to cede is that yes, political violence is typically justified against a lens of values. Societally the US norm has been that oppression and murder is bad, thus Rittenhouse and his movement are worse than the one killing. Then again the multi-weekly school shootings seem not to be bad, so maybe killing isn’t bad any longer?
You are wrong, in all your paragraphs. And with one exception* in all your statements.
There is no debate here, history has shown you wrong again and again, for thousands of years, in every state, every idea, every example of oppression.
Your take that the The Adjuster was part of some movement is bullshit, he was a lone terrorist for a cause resonating with the public, this is the spark of revolutions. Him not being organised is the opening for this revolution to be quelled before gaining momentum.
*The only statement of yours I’m willing to cede is that yes, political violence is typically justified against a lens of values. Societally the US norm has been that oppression and murder is bad, thus Rittenhouse and his movement are worse than the one killing. Then again the multi-weekly school shootings seem not to be bad, so maybe killing isn’t bad any longer?