db0M to [email protected] • 1 day agoTaps the sign...lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1466arrow-down157
arrow-up1409arrow-down1imageTaps the sign...lemmy.dbzer0.comdb0M to [email protected] • 1 day agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-219 hours ago Being straight will always BE the default. It’s a requirement for the survival of the species. Three different arguments against that: Why wouldn’t bi people be the “default”? Who says the survival of the species needs to be the standard by which we decide what is default? You’re ignoring technology like artificial wombs. Assuming technology continues to advance, I could see the population thriving even if 100% were gay.
minus-square@Cypherlink2•11 hours ago very rare in other species to have predominantly bi populations pointing to lower evolutionary advantages semantics, default is the expected state doesn’t exist and won’t change the evolutionary pressures for a predominantly heterosexual population
Three different arguments against that:
Why wouldn’t bi people be the “default”?
Who says the survival of the species needs to be the standard by which we decide what is default?
You’re ignoring technology like artificial wombs. Assuming technology continues to advance, I could see the population thriving even if 100% were gay.