minus-square@davidgrolink1•5 hours agoIt was an elective amputation because he couldn’t walk on it, I didn’t see any mention of gangrene or anything else infectious. It was not a case where it was removed for threatening his life like gangrene would have been.
It was an elective amputation because he couldn’t walk on it, I didn’t see any mention of gangrene or anything else infectious.
It was not a case where it was removed for threatening his life like gangrene would have been.