• JackGreenEarth
    link
    fedilink
    -431 year ago

    The allies were defending people. Besides that, they did many immoral things, such as killing deserters of their own side. If you hurt Nazis out of spite when they are not posing a threat to yours or other’s lives, then that is not justified.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      46
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “If you hurt Nazis out of spite when they are not posing a threat to yours or other’s lives, then that is not justified.”

      Correct.

      But nazis are, by definition, a threat to other’s lives, so violence against them is always justified.

      • JackGreenEarth
        link
        fedilink
        -281 year ago

        Read my other reply to a reply to my comment. But I’m worried if we set the ‘threat to lives’ bar too low, when they are not actually killing people, they can do the same, and kill you because you are a potential threat to their lives, or the lives of what they would think are genetically inferior children.

        Whatever you decide, it has to go both ways, otherwise is it just a excuse for authoritarian enforcement of whatever your belief happens to be.

        • @Cabrio
          link
          181 year ago

          Only good Nazi is a dead Nazi. Your incapacity to believe them when they show you their ideals is a failure on your part.

          • JackGreenEarth
            link
            fedilink
            -91 year ago

            A nazi isn’t a race of people, it is a belief held by a person, and beliefs can be changed.

            • @Cabrio
              link
              41 year ago

              Good, let the threat of death be the motivator for Nazis to change their ideology.

                • @Cabrio
                  link
                  21 year ago

                  Nobody is convinced against their will, fucking moron. Go ahead say another bunch of stupid shit you don’t even comprehend properly yourself.

        • some_guy
          link
          fedilink
          131 year ago

          you can take the veil off whenever, nobody here believes you’re anything but a nazi

          • JackGreenEarth
            link
            fedilink
            -71 year ago

            I don’t really think that I’m going to convince anyone I’m arguing with right now, but I’m hoping that lurkers, and those who might see this in the future, see that not wanting to kill Nazis is actually a valid opinion that exists.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          131 year ago

          So, let’s see if i got this right:

          when i say nazis deserve violence that’s unacceptable and i deserve violence in response.

          But when nazis say jews, LGBT+ people and other groups deserve violence it’s not ok to wish violence upon them in response.

          🤔 Curious.

          • JackGreenEarth
            link
            fedilink
            -61 year ago

            No, did I ever threaten you with violence in response? You’re straw manning my argument. Both positions where you want to kill any group of people are wrong, and I will try and stop them both in non violent ways - as now, when I am writing this for the benefit of lurkers that they possibly change their mind.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          You’re not actually worried about that. You’re trying to defend them because deep down inside, you agree with some of the things they say and think Nazism and fascism are legitimate political ideologies when they are not, and never have been.

          • JackGreenEarth
            link
            fedilink
            -61 year ago

            Now you’re just claiming stuff which you have no evidence for, and that I refute.

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      171 year ago

      The U.S. wasn’t defending its people. The U.S. was just fighting Nazis.

      • JackGreenEarth
        link
        fedilink
        -11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        yours or others lives

        Did you even read beyond the first sentence of my comment?

        I know attention spans are short these days, but 4 sentences?

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          111 year ago

          You said the allies were defending people. The purpose of the U.S. in the war was offense, not defense. I’m not sure why you being incorrect about that part of your comment should be ignored just because you wrote other things.

          • JackGreenEarth
            link
            fedilink
            -91 year ago

            Because it’s not incorrect when you read the rest of my comment, specifically the quoted and emboldened part? They were defending other’s lives, not their own.

            • Flying SquidOP
              link
              61 year ago

              They were not defending anyone’s lives. They were not there to defend lives. They were there to kill Nazis. That they were able to save lives while doing it is good, but that wasn’t the plan. They didn’t say “well we could attack the Wehrmacht, but instead maybe we’ll stop them from running their tanks through that town with a blockade.” They just bombed the shit out of them.

              • JackGreenEarth
                link
                fedilink
                -41 year ago

                If their goal was not to protect people but to kill nazis, maybe they were doing something wrong. Anyway, it’s different in wartime. We are not in wartime, and modern day people who believe in Nazism are not killing people, so no violent means to convert them will be more effective. Anyway, you’re not even killing them, but expressing your desire to kill them, which if they saw it, all that would happen is you would antagonise them, and make non violent methods less productive, as they would scream ‘Radical Liberals wanttto kill us for our beliefs’ and develop a (rightful) persecution complex, ignoring that they are persecuting other people, or would, if they could.

                But they won’t see this, as you posted this in a far left echo chamber, and they are stuck in their own far right echo chamber. All these sorts of comments (‘all nazis should be killed’) do is drive people apart and make them less susceptible to argument.

                • Flying SquidOP
                  link
                  81 year ago

                  If their goal was not to protect people but to kill nazis, maybe they were doing something wrong.

                  Are you seriously saying prioritizing stopping a genocidal maniac from destroying the world is wrong? Seriously?

                  Anyway, it’s different in wartime. We are not in wartime, and modern day people who believe in Nazism are not killing people

                  Not for lack of trying. Or have you not noticed all the mass shootings? They need to be stopped before it gets worse.

        • @Cabrio
          link
          61 year ago

          I know attention spans are short these days, but 4 sentences?

          Rich coming from the person who’s been told the same thing 10 times by as many different people and still can’t clue on.

          • JackGreenEarth
            link
            fedilink
            -41 year ago

            I have responded to what people are saying in their whole comments. Just because I read their whole comment doesn’t mean I agree with them, and I think I have explained why I don’t agree in my reply. I replied thinking the replyer has a short attention span, as they hadn’t seem to have read the quoted section of my comment, that would have answered their question I thought.

        • @Cabrio
          link
          11 year ago

          deleted by creator

    • @Sylver
      link
      161 year ago

      Letting a Nazi live is immoral. Don’t ever try to justify their ideology and paint it as okay to be left alone.

      • MxM111
        link
        fedilink
        -101 year ago

        Death penalty for mind crime is really immoral in my book.

        • @Cabrio
          link
          151 year ago

          And being a Nazi isn’t?

          • MxM111
            link
            fedilink
            -51 year ago

            It is. So, should you be on the level of Nazi, or worse?

            • @Cabrio
              link
              81 year ago

              Do you practice being this stupid or does it come naturally?

              • MxM111
                link
                fedilink
                -11 year ago

                Do you practice being asshole or does it come naturally? My post did not deserve personal attack.

                • @Cabrio
                  link
                  5
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Both.

                  See when someone’s wilful ignorance and stupidity extends to such levels that they refuse to comprehend, reason, and think, then there’s no further room for discussion or conversation, you weren’t interested in either, just forcing your poorly developed opinion down other people’s throats.

                  So no, fuck you for being a disingenuous, willfully ignorant piece of shit, the pain of dealing with your stupidity shouldn’t be a one way street.

                  Nazi apologists deserve the same fate as Nazis.

                  • MxM111
                    link
                    fedilink
                    0
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Why do you say I am Nazi apologist when the only thing is said that killing a Nazi, when they did not commit any crime or did any immoral action is immoral? Killing just for the mind crime, for possibility that they comment something in the future? And not just you consider that it is right to kill them, you went completely ballistic for suggestion that that it is immoral to kill them?

        • @SCB
          link
          71 year ago

          If you only have thoughts in your head, and don’t act on them, it’s impossible for anyone to know you’re a piece of shit.

      • JackGreenEarth
        link
        fedilink
        -141 year ago

        I’m not justifying their ideology, and I fully support trying to change their mind and decrease their influence in non-violent ways. Your apparent desire to kill anyone for a belief they currently hold is antithetical to a free and happy society, and ignores how their Nazism may not be a permanent belief, and could be changed through non violent means, such as education, deradicalisation therapy, and general reorganization of society to increase happiness and wellbeing, which would need democratic action to take place.

          • JackGreenEarth
            link
            fedilink
            -41 year ago

            How did I justify their ideology? Or are you one of those black and white people that think disagreeing with you about anything means automatically agreeing 100% with your political enemy?

          • JackGreenEarth
            link
            fedilink
            -51 year ago

            How did I justify their ideology? Or are you one of those black and white people that think disagreeing with you about anything means automatically agreeing 100% with your political enemy?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          Your apparent desire to kill anyone for a belief they currently hold is antithetical to a free and happy society,

          But theirs doesn’t; their desires are legitimate political beliefs that have to be respected, catered to and appeased while the left even thinking of doing anything in the name of their best interests or even their survival is completely morally unacceptable and needs to be shot down whenever possible.

          And when fascists actually do murder people in public, it’s completely ignored by you.

          • JackGreenEarth
            link
            fedilink
            -61 year ago

            I’m not talking to Nazis right now, but if I was, I would also advocate that they don’t kill, or threaten to kill people, and if it was in real life, encourage them to spend time with people from races they discriminate against, to show them that the people aren’t all that bad.

            I’m for less killing all round.

            • @SCB
              link
              5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Go on a long walk in the Serengeti and explain to the lions that you won’t fight back, but that them eating you breaks your personal moral code.

              Come back and tell us about it.

        • Lunyan
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          The problem is, we can’t have a free and happy society with Nazi’s in it. Yeah sure wanting Nazi’s dead is bad, but “reorganizing society to increase happiness and wellbeing” isn’t something that will happen quickly, but still they continue to exist.

          • JackGreenEarth
            link
            fedilink
            -41 year ago

            Of course, the last one is a long term change, but you can still try to befriend Nazis and show them other races aren’t that bad. Often they are racist because they haven’t had exposure to other races, so you can give them that. You can still argue with them, get them therapy. But can’t anyone see that saying you want to kill them makes you look good and get upvotes to your left wing echo chamber, but for the actual Nazis that you supposedly hate, all it does is drive them apart and make them more strong in their beliefs?

    • PugJesus
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Could you inform me as to when, exactly, someone whose ideology is based around the sudden and unsupported overthrow of legitimate government through a mixture of public chilling violence and abuse of democratic institutions, in favor of a regime that worships death and war, and believes undesirables should be exterminated on an industrial scale, is NOT a threat to mine or others’ lives?

      Punching Nazis is unacceptable because we outsource our violence to the government, and democratic governments must be careful about applying violence to opinions if they wish to retain legitimacy. Not because Nazis aren’t 100% deserving of a beat-down.

      • JackGreenEarth
        link
        fedilink
        -151 year ago

        They are a potential threat, they are not killing people in the streets. If it got to that, non violent protest would be much weaker. But as it is, we can have a greater impact, and actually change people’s minds rather than just antagonise them and stay inside our respective echo chambers, by using the non violent methods listed in my other comment.

          • JackGreenEarth
            link
            fedilink
            -41 year ago

            On an individual basis, deal with the people killing people in the streets, preferably non violently, violently if you have to. But the other Nazis, the majority of them, who were taught their beliefs from their parents and online echo chambers, and never questioned them, can be much better converted by argument and education than displaying your intent to kill them.

            When someone says they want to kill you, you don’t think ‘I should believe something different’ (and anyway someone convinced against their will is of the same opinion still), you think, ‘these people are dangerous, I need to fight them back’.

            Do you see how violence, or the threat of violent towards Nazis doesn’t change their minds, but only make them more antagonised toward you?

        • chaogomu
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          I suggest you actually look at what Nazis, Neo-Nazis, and Fascist fucks regularly do to homeless camps. It’s not pretty, and sometimes police officers join in on the violence.

          Then there’s the active assaults on random people in Portland, that shit happens every couple of months when one of these groups holds a rally there. Note that none of these fucks live in Portland, they just like to go in and throw their weight around.

          All this in an environment where their ideology is not supported by the main stream. When Nazis and Fascist gain power, they spread hatred and violence. It’s what they do, because it’s what the ideology demands.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They are a proven threat. They DID kill people in the streets. This isn’t a “three strikes and you’re out” situation. Nazis do not get the benefit of the doubt, nor do they deserve it.

          • @Holyginz
            link
            81 year ago

            They already received like 5+ strikes the first time around, this time they get zero

    • Remmock
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      A Nazi will always be a threat to you and yours. The changes they’re forcing through Congress are evidence enough of their disdain for “others”, but you can always research the violence inflicted on their political opponents that they seem immune to if you’d like.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      You’re out here undermining the actions of Allies to defend Nazis and you don’t see a problem with your behavior.

      • JackGreenEarth
        link
        fedilink
        -41 year ago

        Read my other comments and decide again if you think I’m defending Nazis. I realise that things aren’t black and white, and the allies did some bad things too, but I still think what the Nazis did in WW2 was evil. I just don’t think violently assaulting them now, or saying that you want to, will actually convert Nazis to your side, it will only antagonise them further.

        It’s an argument in what’s practical.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Nazism is a caustic, violent, hateful ideology that is intentionally and purposefully threatening by its very nature. There is no such thing as a Nazi that doesn’t pose a threat.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Yeah. And then read mine about how any Nazi represents a clear and present danger to literally everyone who is not also a Nazi. They do not get the benefit of the doubt, ever, under any circumstances.