@JDubbleu to PC Master RaceEnglish • 1 year agoLatency just still isn't there unfortunatelyimagemessage-square192arrow-up1574arrow-down187
arrow-up1487arrow-down1imageLatency just still isn't there unfortunately@JDubbleu to PC Master RaceEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square192
minus-square@harklinkEnglish1•edit-21 year ago1000 (milliseconds in a second)/140(hz) = ~7.14ms per hz Not sure how you got 30ms being twice as fast as what a 140hz monitor can display.
1000 (milliseconds in a second)/140(hz) = ~7.14ms per hz
Not sure how you got 30ms being twice as fast as what a 140hz monitor can display.