“Billionaires and landlords are bad for society.”
Hard agree!
“There should be less billionaires and landlords.”
Okay, I agree with that too.
“We should kill them!”
NO! FUCK NO!
I understand that if society is going to change for the better, that some people deliberately stand in the way and others will inevitably be forced to stop them. But there’s this new school of thought that says “My enemies are ontologically evil and all harm done towards them is morally good” which sickens me.
An act can be justified, necessary, and still immoral.
Exactly! It goes like this to me:
“Billionaires and landlords are bad for society.” Hard agree!
“There should be less billionaires and landlords.” Okay, I agree with that too.
“We should kill them!” NO! FUCK NO!
I understand that if society is going to change for the better, that some people deliberately stand in the way and others will inevitably be forced to stop them. But there’s this new school of thought that says “My enemies are ontologically evil and all harm done towards them is morally good” which sickens me.
An act can be justified, necessary, and still immoral.