Suppose my religious morals were that evolution is a farce, condoms and responsible sex were akin to murder, and independent thought outside the church was frowned upon.
Would it still be a bad thing for the judge to rule against that? It’s a slippery slope, but the line has to be drawn somewhere for the sake of the kids themselves.
Suppose my religious morals were that evolution is a farce, condoms and responsible sex were akin to murder, and independent thought outside the church was frowned upon.
Would it still be a bad thing for the judge to rule against that? It’s a slippery slope, but the line has to be drawn somewhere for the sake of the kids themselves.