Place Team Points #1 Votes Movement
1 Georgia 172 5 -
2 Michigan 164 1 -
3 Ohio State 146 0 -
4 Alabama 146 0 +1
5 Florida State 140 1 +10
6 Penn State 130 0 -
7 Tennessee 123 0 +3
8 Washington 117 0 +4
9 Texas 116 0 -1
10 Utah 116 0 +1
11 Oregon 109 0 +3
12 USC 107 0 -5
13 Notre Dame 99 0 -4
14 LSU 66 0 -10
15 North Carolina 62 0 +7
16 Oklahoma 59 0 +3
17 Kansas State 52 0 +1
18 Ole Miss 52 0 +2
19 Wisconsin 49 0 -2
20 Texas A&M 45 0 +1
21 Oregon State 36 0 +3
22 Duke 34 0 NR
23 Colorado 27 0 NR
24 Tulane 26 0 -1
25 Louisville 15 0 NR

Others receiving votes: Arkansas(11), Iowa (10), Clemson (9), TCU (7), Wake Forest (7), Kentucky (6), Mississipi State (6), UCLA (4), Miami (FL) (3), UTSA (2), Florida (1), Kansas (1)

Link to check out the spreadsheet of responses here

  • g0d0fm15ch13fOPMEnglish
    2•1 year ago

    I’m not sure. I made the changes because having two number threes was driving me nuts and I like the elegance of the previous weeks rankings being the tie breaker. However there are several corner cases here that aren’t accounted for. Say two unranked teams tie at 25th? That seems very possible with only half a dozen or so voters. So do we see who recieved more votes previously? And what if we have a situation next week where Texas (hopefully) beats bama but not in a very convincing way and they tie for 6th? The current tiebreaker would have alabama in the lead but Texas would literally be coming off a win over them. So add a head to head clause? I think I personally want a tie breaker, but I definitely want one that works for the community and covers all our bases.