• @Katana314
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    I’d say people have a right to defense against a reasonable threat - and that there’s some very confused interpretations of “reasonable”.

    For instance: A military installation is going to install an AA gun because it’s not unreasonable to think an opposing country might try to bomb them.

    But your home is also easily within bombing range of other unfriendly countries. Why not have an AA gun there? (Assuming, for a second, cost is negligible) Because the minute risk that a plane would ever specifically target your home is outweighed by the increased safety risks of having a dangerous piece of artillery in an otherwise peaceful area. In that case, you are making the problem worse, not better.

    If a woman has received threats from an old ex, I wouldn’t complain about her carrying something to defend herself. But a world where everyone is using the same excuse, or painting over personal reasons of “It looks cool”, to the point they have more guns than people, is a world that is going to be unsafe either way; especially because having a gun doesn’t necessarily keep you safe from other guns.