• ElleChaise
    link
    fedilink
    -18
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Practically nobody does uber as their main job, they do it because they either want/need extra money, or are struggling to survive at all. I know uberers, none of them would choose the job, but they can’t find other work. There’s an intentional lack of employment, in my country at least, to keep the workers moving forward; “Do for us, or end up like those people”.

    • Bonehead
      link
      fedilink
      3311 months ago

      If your business requires you to exploit your workers in order to make a profit, then your business doesn’t deserve to exist. Making excuses for the exploiters changes nothing.

      • @Okokimup
        link
        English
        011 months ago

        If the business doesn’t deserve to exist, why do customers keep supporting them? Why is the onus only on the workers to suffer?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1811 months ago

          That’s actually an excellent question. You should look into why people who work for America’s largest employer can only afford to shop at Walmart, have little to no benefits, no job security, and often qualify for food stamps (which is American taxpayers subsidizing their salaries). The owners of America’s largest employer are worth like $140,000,000,000.

          Hint: it’s coercion.

        • zeluko
          link
          fedilink
          11
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          “Free” market doesnt really work without regulation, otherwise we shift towards current business models where you, the customer, often dont really have the choice.

        • Bonehead
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Why are customers responsible for ensuring that workers get paid fairly? I’m looking for a service. If your service cannot exist without exploiting your workers, then it doesn’t deserve to exist. You are not entitled to exploit people for your own gain.

          • @Okokimup
            link
            English
            111 months ago

            If you know the workers are being exploited, and you use the service anyway, how are you not partially responsible for exploiting them? It seems like you feel entitled to exploit them for your own gain as a customer. I agree that the employer is also responsible. A way to hold them accountable would be to eschew the service altogether. Otherwise, what incentive do they have to change?

            • Bonehead
              link
              fedilink
              611 months ago

              I don’t use these services, for that exact reason. I’d rather cut out the middle man and contact the restaurant directly and then pick up my own order. That way all the money goes to the restaurant, instead of some business who’s only purpose is to extract money from other people’s work.