Doug HollandM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUNDEnglish • 1 year agoPlastics companies knew for decades recycling was not viable but promoted it regardless, Center for Climate Integrity study findswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square2arrow-up162arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]news[email protected]sustainability[email protected]world
arrow-up158arrow-down1external-linkPlastics companies knew for decades recycling was not viable but promoted it regardless, Center for Climate Integrity study findswww.theguardian.comDoug HollandM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUNDEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square2cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]news[email protected]sustainability[email protected]world
minus-square@GlitterInfectionlinkEnglish7•1 year agoAll plastic recycling is bad for the environment. Virtually all of it. The only purpose recycling serves is to push the blame for plastics waste onto the consumer. It was a very effective marketing campaign, and nothing good.
All plastic recycling is bad for the environment. Virtually all of it. The only purpose recycling serves is to push the blame for plastics waste onto the consumer.
It was a very effective marketing campaign, and nothing good.