Edit: see comments for clarifications.

I am probably late on this one, but god damn this is one nasty trick by Philips.

Context; I recently decided to upgrade my shaver, from a Philips One Blade to Philips an all-in-one-trimmer-7000. As you can see on the pictures below, they changed the charger for the adapter by maybe 1–2 millimetres, just so the old charger could not be used by the old charger. Now, this normally isn’t a big deal, but with the new trimmer, the charger is USB-A only. Where’s the previous one had the plug on it instead. To me this is mildly infuriating as I know need to get an extra adapter just to charge my shaver in the bathroom. They had the exact same design for the chargers, yet changed it just slightly so they wouldn’t be able to be reused? Why… Philips… why?

Edit: many good points in the comments! I don’t know how to manually check the voltage, but seems like folks figured it out in the comments too. Should have just been USB-C!

    • @Pwnmode
      link
      English
      310 months ago

      I literally won’t buy a product that uses micro USB. It’s the only.standard cable I have used where I’ve had both cables and the connector on the device fail.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        Just on a regularly occurring basis. They were always the failure point in my devices.

        Absolutely garbage durability.

        • @Pwnmode
          link
          English
          210 months ago

          Doesn’t break as often as Micro USB so I hate it slightly less. :D

    • @hikaru755
      link
      English
      110 months ago

      B is fine, just a bit big. Agree on micro though.

      • @hikaru755
        link
        English
        410 months ago

        How is USB-C worse than either of them

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Lots of pins, hard to solder, requires higher precision in PCB manufacturing. Type B has better mechanical properties.

          • @hikaru755
            link
            English
            110 months ago

            Pretty sure most people here are talking about the usage side of things. If we were to go by effort to implement the connector, let’s just go back to serial ports

              • @hikaru755
                link
                English
                110 months ago

                Will if we’re only talking charging, USB-C should be as easy to implement as any of them, basic 5v is gonna work even without most of the pins connected

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Without most of the pins connected, but you still need to manufacture PCB with small tolerances because socket manufacturers don’t care you don’t need extra pins…