An event can force a mental health crisis. You’re wrong if you believe otherwise.

You’re trying to say “everyone who lights themselves on fire is having a mental health crisis” - this is true.

You’re also saying “if a common event like eviction results in self immolation it’s entirely the fault of mental health crisis and not eviction, because not everyone evicted self immolates” - this is false.

You’re intentionally reversing cause and effect, when it’s obviously wrong.

It’s a weird thing - you getting your rocks off acting willfully ignorant and belligerent over some arbitrary belief that events can’t be responsible for a mental health crises if the reaction isn’t typical.

Why do you insist it is so important that everyone you interact with in this thread believes only mental health crisis can carry the blame?

Why is it not possible for someone who is being evicted to light themselves on fire because they are being evicted?

What makes this exclusively a mental health issue, and not a housing crisis issue?

Which would be more effective at stopping self immolations during eviction - affordable housing preventing eviction but no mental health support? Or mental health support prior to eviction, but the individual will still be homeless?

Which outcome is better? If the old man didn’t self immolate, but instead became homeless? Or if the old man was never worried about losing shelter because they would never lose shelter?