• @assassin_aragornOP
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    No I agree with you, it is an accurate take, it just feels unnecessary in a headline and a bit biased.

    That said, it was probably unnecessary for me to mention too. I tried too hard to preempt criticism in my description. I’ll just delete that and let the article stand for itself. Ironically, I’m doing more editorializing by saying all that.

    Edit: As for the actual subject matter of the article, Jesus < 8% representation is low for ~49% of the population. It’s unacceptable.