This is the best summary I could come up with:

In August, word leaked out that The New York Times was considering joining the growing legion of creators that are suing AI companies for misappropriating their content.

In addition, each print edition has a copyright notification, the Times’ terms of service limit the copying and use of any published material, and it can be selective about how it licenses its stories.

One of the sources used is a large collection of online material called “Common Crawl,” which the suit alleges contains information from 16 million unique records from sites published by The Times.

OpenAI no longer discloses as many details of the data used for training of recent GPT versions, but all indications are that full-text NY Times articles are still part of that process (Much more on that in a moment.)

“Defendants’ GenAI tools can generate output that recites Times content verbatim, closely summarizes it, and mimics its expressive style, as demonstrated by scores of examples,” the suit alleges.

"A GPT model completely fabricated that “The New York Times published an article on January 10, 2020, titled ‘Study Finds Possible Link between Orange Juice and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma,’” the suit alleges.

The original article contains 1,090 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

Lololol they are going to get kicked out on their ass. This is such a terrible suit.