• themeatbridge
      link
      341 year ago

      Statistically, someone carrying a badge is more likely to be a criminal than someone carrying money.

        • @voracitude
          link
          141 year ago

          Just count the news stories about “local person with a bag of cash responds to domestic disturbance call, shoots elderly woman, her grandson, and their dog” or “local person with a bag of cash kills pedestrians in DUI crash, suspended with pay”.

  • guyrocket
    link
    fedilink
    341 year ago

    I don’t know how or why asset forfiture was ever allowed, moral, or legal but it should have been outlawed a very long time ago.

    Legalized thievery is worse than actual theft. It is corrupt and morally bankrupt.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    After “seizing” a bunch of cash, the police are carrying a bunch of cash. Statement checks out.

  • Th4tGuyII
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    Yet if you’re not carrying any you’re a criminal vagrant, so you’re screwed either way

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    I know everyone likes to hate on cryptocurrency, but I think there is something beautiful about cash you can carry entirely in a series of words you’ve memorized that no one can prove you even have.

    • BrikoXOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Unless you use something like Monero it’s still useless since blockchain is neither anonymous, not private and since all exchanges requires KYC (Know Your Customer), your identity will be tied to that money.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Unless you use something like Monero

        So just do that? I don’t get this argument that lack of anonymity is a fatal flaw when various effective anonymizing solutions exist.

        But anyway that talking point isn’t even relevant in this circumstance. It doesn’t matter if it is possible in theory for someone with access to exchange records to uncover a link between you and your crypto holdings. Cops looking to mug you at a traffic stop or the airport are not going to find it practical to do that, and even if they did they have no way to take it from you simply because it isn’t a physical object. It’s an objective fact that cryptocurrency is massively more resistant to civil forfeiture than physical cash.

        • BrikoXOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t get this argument that lack of anonymity is a fatal flaw when various effective anonymizing solutions exist.

          It’s only not a flaw if people do take those extra steps. By default, it’s not anonymous and that is an important caveat.

          It’s an objective fact that cryptocurrency is massively more resistant to civil forfeiture than physical cash.

          As is a bank account if that’s the threat model. Everything is relative to a threat model you want to protect from.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            As is a bank account if that’s the threat model.

            I see this as being about control as much as threat model. Using a bank as a defense against civil forfeiture is exactly what these cops are calling people criminals for not doing.