Different countries have different distributions, click “change”. Canada, Australia, New Zealand have similar to the US. France, Germany, UK peak 40-44.

  • @roofuskit
    link
    English
    4110 months ago

    Almost 20 years of schooling, crushing amounts of debt, no respect from elders, and shit income. Sounds about right.

    • @MindSkipperBro12
      link
      English
      17
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      “Got no girlfriend, got no pride”

      “Always broke and dead inside”

  • @the_q
    link
    English
    27
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • @hperrin
    link
    English
    1710 months ago

    There’s probably a very sobering reason for that.

    • flicker
      link
      English
      410 months ago

      I know, right? Anybody in here who is a statistic will tell you why that number goes down over time.

  • The Dark Lord ☑️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Could there be a sample bias? I’m willing to bet that young people are more accepting of receiving therapy, and thus more likely to get diagnosed?

    Edit: the info says “whether or not they’ve been diagnosed”. Looks like they took it into account. Damn scientists being smarter than me!

  • SanguinePar
    link
    English
    10
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    That’s really interesting, thanks for the link.

    Looking at the UK, there’s an interesting pattern between 2010 and 2019 - the 40-44 group is one of the lowest and is that the bottom of a dip. But by 2019, that same age group is the one with the highest rate, and is at the top of a hill.

    I wonder why? What caused that age group and those around it to reverse their order?

    You can also see that shift here:

    • @Plopp
      link
      English
      110 months ago

      It’s different people in that group 9 years later? 40-44 in 2019 was 30-34 in 2010. In 2010 the 30-34 group was the second highest. Maybe they carry that spike with them over time.

      • SanguinePar
        link
        English
        110 months ago

        Yeah, maybe.Although, that carry forward effect doesn’t seem to apply elsewhere, or else we’d see the same “hill-valley-hill” pattern shifted up a couple of age groups.

        The numbers are probably too small for it to have any real significance, but it’s interesting anyway :-)

  • @afraid_of_zombies
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    You 18: every adult I know is a failure. All they want out of life is a career, a home, a partner, and kids. Don’t they know you just get this stuff by default?

    You 24: well fuck me

    You 30: the amount of stuff in my life that is currently on fire is pretty low. So today is a good day.

    Edit: a word

  • @j4k3
    link
    English
    510 months ago

    Bet it could be directly correlated with income.

  • plz1
    link
    English
    310 months ago

    It peaked, but stayed there, going on 15+ years…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    310 months ago

    I gotta say, that’s a great interactive graph. Not only does it allow you to change regions, you can easily change from a single year to multi-year timespan graph to see how it changes over time.

    I just wish the timespan graph would display the values still ordered by age. Because I was wondering if would shift with the/a generation getting older or not.

      • Quokka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        Because on everyone else’s chart it gets better with age, in Germany it looks like you’re just fucked for life.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Only because it scales relative to the maximum value, it looks worse at a glance when it’s actually notably better.

          • Quokka
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            The maximum value is the population, as a percent of society it doesn’t get better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        If I were* a kraut

        When using be in an if clause for an unreal conditional sentence, always conjugate it as were, no matter what the subject is. Even if the subject is first-person singular (I) or third-person singular (he, she, or it), still use were with an if clause in unreal conditional sentences.

        • @MindSkipperBro12
          link
          English
          210 months ago

          Yeah, I wrote that before I hit the hay, thanks for the correction.😊👍