• @BoxerDevil
    link
    English
    67 months ago

    For once I agree with a police union

    • @AA5B
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      As long as anyone else is prohibited off duty, the same should apply. If there’s a safety argument for a trucker, for example, an officer should be held to at least as high a standard.

      I haven’t paid attention to this issue since it doesn’t affect me, but are we still at the stage of no good way to tell whether a person is “under the influence”, vs chemical traces for weeks after?

      It seems like a timing requirement might be more effective and fair: for example pilots can’t fly within 8 hours of drinking alcohol. I can definitely see a similar requirement to help ensure you’re not under the influence while putting public safety at risk

      • @BoxerDevil
        link
        English
        17 months ago

        Actually I just saw an article stating they had made a test with 96% accuracy

    • @FlyboyM619
      link
      English
      27 months ago

      A case of the worst person you know made a good point.

  • @kttnpunk
    link
    English
    47 months ago

    Bet this police union has had different opinions on marijuana in the past when it suited them…

  • @Whirling_Ashandarei
    link
    English
    17 months ago

    Split on this, bc fuck pigs, but maybe if they smoked some weed they’d chill the hell out and stop killing innocent people/animals/etc.