• kirklennon
    link
    fedilink
    34 months ago

    I’m sympathetic to the goal of trying to recycle more bottles but here’s my problem: Like more than 10% of the population of the state, I live in Seattle. I have a giant blue recycle bin that’s included for free with garbage service. The cheapest, laziest thing I can do with a plastic bottle is throw it in my recycling bin for efficient, high-volume pickup and recycling. The proposed deposit system adds a lot of administrative hassle, inconvenience, and waste (in the form of recycling return bags). Or I do what’s easiest and the most environmentally friendly but accept an extra expense. Would our resources not be better spent encouraging or subsidizing recycling programs in communities with difficult, expensive, or non-existent recycling programs? We don’t even have to hit every tiny town in the middle of nowhere to make a big difference. There has to be a good amount of low-hanging fruit out there where we could get a lot more recycling done, without making recycling worse in the places where it already has high participation.

    • @Orbituary
      link
      34 months ago

      East Queen Anner here.

      You nailed it. Recycling is already flawed as hell and doesn’t do what we think it even does. I feel like this proposal is being introduced to fix some sort of gap in funding the existing program but is being sold to the public as a way to get back a hidden fee, knowing full well most people won’t take advantage of it, due to the hassle.