Over 50,000 AT&T outages were reported at about 7 a.m. ET Thursday, with most issues reported in Houston, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, and Atlanta, according to tracking site Downdetector.

AT&T’s network suffered a widespread outages across the country Thursday morning with cellular service and internet down, according to the tracking site Downdetector.

Some Verizon and T-Mobile customers also reported outages, though theirs appeared to be less widespread than AT&T.

Over 32,000 AT&T outages were reported by customers at about 4 a.m. ET Thursday. Reports dipped then spiked again to more than 50,000 around 7 a.m., with most issues reported in Houston, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, and Atlanta, according to the site.

That number surged to more than 71,000 just before 8 a.m. ET.

A little over 1,100 T-mobile outages and about 3,000 Verizon outages were reported as of 7 a.m. Thursday.

It’s not clear what triggered the service disruption.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    379 months ago

    Apparently Verizon and T Mobile are fine, their users were just trying to contact AT&T friends/family and couldn’t so they thought they were having an outage (per the article on The Verge).

  • Admiral Patrick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    As a T-Mobile customer, if I’m affected by this, I’d probably never notice. Signal just disappears randomly on most days whether due to a “local site issue” (their term) or a butterfly flapping its wings between my device and the tower.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      109 months ago

      You should reset your network settings on your phone. I have T-Mobile and it’s by far the best network I’ve used. If you’re in the deep countryside then you’ll have issues. You shouldn’t be seeing issues like that at all.

      • Admiral Patrick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        I have to reset the network configs about once a month because VoLTE just stops working, and that’s the only fix. I’ve been through FCC complaints, customer service, case manager, etc. There are 3 towers visible from my house, and I can throw a rock and hit one of them.

        • @ObsidianZed
          link
          49 months ago

          Sounds like you have other problems but I want to say there’s such a thing as being too close to a tower as well.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          That was my experience as well. Switched to AT&T which has its own problems but at least it’s consistent. I absolutely hate that AT&T basically has an allow list of phones that reliably work on their network.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        As an alternate viewpoint, I had T-Mobile for years, and I couldn’t keep a phone call connected for more than 10 minutes. If I travelled across the metro area (about 600K people), the call would drop 4 times from one side of the city to the other. Since I got on Verizon, it’s been bulletproof. I imagine these things are very location-dependent.

        • icedterminal
          link
          English
          49 months ago

          Definitely location dependent. It’s all about who has the better cell tower location(s) and how many are present. Sometimes they don’t overlap enough or they are in a poor location.

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      I’m a Google Fi member. About a year ago all of our phones (a pixel 5, 7 and 4a 5G) all went from doing their normal thing to having full LTE signal all the time that’s totally useless. Speed tests show it as 100kbps down and maybe 50kbps up. All the time.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    119 months ago

    This reminded me that I left my phone in the other room and I’m waiting for a phone call. Seriously, thank you.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      39 months ago

      Well… that phone call never came. Apparently because my phone service isn’t working.

      D’oh!

    • @Rapidcreek
      link
      69 months ago

      That’s just the report number. It’s a pretty large report number. During the wireline days, if you got that kind of number the President of the company had to appear in person at the FCC offices within 24 hours to explain it.

      • ares35
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        afaik, cellular is (still) not obligated to the same service standards as pots.

        • @Rapidcreek
          link
          29 months ago

          Not exactly. Mobile service has higher downtime and outages are more localized usually. If a mobile cell goes down, not a big deal on outage report. But, if you have a wireline CO failure, that’s a problem. In addition, there is a difference in user perception, so mobile is less reported.

  • @Rapidcreek
    link
    4
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Over 50,000 AT&T outages were reported at about 7 a.m. ET Thursday, with most issues reported in Houston, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, and Atlanta, according to tracking site Downdetector.

    Considering the scatter, this doesn’t appear to be a network problem, unless somebody did something really stupid. Magnetic storm?

    Edit : Rumor is its a SIM registration issue. But, that doesn’t make too much sense.

    • @linearchaos
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I think it’s far more likely to be an attack.

      Edit: If it does in fact turn out it’s just AT& T then hanlon’s razor and somebody made a boo boo on change control.

      • @MotoAsh
        link
        3
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I dunno’, DNS hiccups cause more of an outage than this. If it’s an attack, it’s either a probe that went too far or kiddy’s first ddos script.

        • @Zron
          link
          29 months ago

          If kiddy’s first ddos script can bring half the country’s cell phones down, then I think ATT has some explaining to do.

          • @MotoAsh
            link
            19 months ago

            Oh, I’m sure they would for a serious, in-depth audit. Hopefully this isn’t a Lucille Ball moment.

      • @Rapidcreek
        link
        -39 months ago

        If you wanted to attack, you’d be like bin Laden and go after NYC, not Atlanta.

        • SolidGrue
          link
          English
          29 months ago

          Eric Rudolph has entered the chat

        • @linearchaos
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          You don’t attack wireless in a town you attack the backbone network. NYC was affected as well.

          But now that it seems that only AT&t was affected, change control issues are far more likely

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Those backbone exchange points are pretty well protected. I walk past the one in Boston pretty frequently. You’d never know it was there by looking at the building. But the actual datacenter is deep inside the building somewhere, probably the basement. Very hard to get to.

            Although now that I’m looking at the building on Google maps, it looks like the generators and HVAC are all on the roof? I don’t think I can tell what belongs to the datacenter, but if those do, you could easily take them out with a couple drones.

            Of course, they would just fail over to their alternate site in Lowell if anything happened to Boston. And if that site went offline too, local peers might be offline for a bit, but the rest of the Internet would just route around that node.

            • @linearchaos
              link
              English
              19 months ago

              Social engineering, zero day vulnerabilies, inside operatives. Their security runs tight ships but the towers are on the backbone and unmanned. The hardware isn’t all custom. Vulnerabilities happen. I wouldn’t be shocked if they could. E knocked out by some careful BGP hackery.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                19 months ago

                Yeah, BGP fuckery takes sites offline far too often. But you don’t need access to a specific site to do that, you just need to be someone that can announce routes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      I am affected by the outage. ATT. My phone tells me i’m not registered when i try to make a call. I cant send SMS. On the outage map, it just shows that it is the cell tower that is causing outage.

      • @Rapidcreek
        link
        -1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I won’t go through how you authenticate into a mobile network, but when you can’t your phone is pretty useless. The local cell doesn’t have a thing to do with it.

      • @Rapidcreek
        link
        39 months ago

        If a mobile phone is all you have, and you can’t authenticate to the network, you won’t have a way to make a report.