The House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party sent a letter on Saturday to SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk demanding that U.S. troops stationed in Taiwan get access to SpaceX’s Starshield, a satellite communication network designed specifically for the military.

The letter, obtained by CNBC and first reported by Forbes, claimed that by not making Starshield available to U.S. military forces in Taiwan, SpaceX could violate its Pentagon contract, which requires “global access” to Starshield technology.

  • @geekworking
    link
    977 months ago

    Why TF are we renting military stuff from any 3rd party and essentially giving them control to override the military chain of command in the first place? I can’t see this sitting well with anyone on the military side of this.

    • @DandomRude
      link
      207 months ago

      Presumably for the same reason that many US prisons are run by private individuals.

    • @mods_are_assholes
      link
      37 months ago

      Outsourcing is the new thing, you don’t have to take the blame and that’s value for a lot of decision makers.

      Also it always, ALWAYS results in a shittier product. Which is part of the reason why the world is fucked right now.

    • @kerrypacker
      link
      -21
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That’s how the whole military works. You think they spend too much now…try socialising it all.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    577 months ago

    “We demand that you make us reliant on you for communications!”

    JFC we spend a trillion bucks a year on the military. Why don’t they have their own satellite internet already?

    • @Crack0n7uesday
      link
      11
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      They do, it just not as fast or reliable. SpaceX put more into infrastructure whereas the Military just did bare minimum. Now that Starlink is so much better, it’s cheaper and more efficient to rent from them than to continue building their own.

        • @Wrench
          link
          22
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          They’d have to seize spaceX too, which is the reason that starlink is viable in the first place due to reduced costs in launching satellites.

          And then if they do both, survive the brain drain while simultaneously surviving the onslaught of Republican attempts to defund it into oblivion, because that’s what they do.

          Yeah. I don’t like those chances, nor do I like Musk essentially having power over foreign relations. Kinda lose lose, which is why we’re in this shitty holding pattern atm.

        • @Illuminostro
          link
          6
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You know what would be the cherry on top? Seize all of Musk’s assets, and kick his ass out of the country. Along with the Murdochs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          You can’t really put a real cost on seizing something like that. Not all of the costs will be up front or even obvious. People don’t like having their stit stolen, oddly enough.

        • @Crack0n7uesday
          link
          -17 months ago

          Do you really want to give the government the power to do that, and then hand that power over to the military… I don’t like Musk but I see so many worse scenarios with this being controlled by the military.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              37 months ago

              This is crazy talk. Anybody can smuggle some terminals into their country. That doesn’t mean they’re being “helped”. The US government would come down on SpaceX with unprecedented force if they violated sanctions like that

              • Flying Squid
                link
                27 months ago

                It’s crazy talk? No. It’s reality. Elon shut down Starlink for the Ukraine military with the excuse that they would have started World War 3. Meaning he has the power to shut down Starlink for the Russians as well.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17 months ago

                  They didn’t have it on in that area and refused to turn it on when asked. They didn’t just shut down the sats.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  I’d love to better understand your position. it seems like you think that Starlink is aware of who is using a terminal. how can Starlink differentiate between a Ukrainian and Russian user in the same general area? should Starlink randomly turn off user terminals it suspects? what if it accidentally turns off a Ukrainian one? billing is obv not a good indicator

                  I want to understand your thoughts a little more clearly on this

          • TheChurn
            link
            fedilink
            67 months ago

            The government already has the power to do that.

            If shit ever hit the fan, they could just invoke the DPA and force starlink to do exactly what they say.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -27 months ago

          that seems pretty stupid, should we also seize Amazon Kuiper when they start launching very soon?

          • HubertManne
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            yeah if they contract for military access and then dumbassidly refuse to give it.

      • @lurker8008
        link
        97 months ago

        Who do you think paid for SpaceX to launch all those satellites?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      We do. They’re all geostationary. So high latency and low bandwidth. Been in operation early 2000.

  • @phoneymouse
    link
    317 months ago

    US military should build its own damn starlink as a matter of national security

    • @mods_are_assholes
      link
      57 months ago

      You are correct, but if they try it’ll just get diverted and used to feed the oligarchs.

      I’d rather the U.S. government just seize all of the muskrat’s businesses and nationalize them.

    • @PeterPoopshit
      link
      4
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Something something military industrial complex

  • Flying Squid
    link
    177 months ago

    Elon says no because he doesn’t want to start a nuclear war. Which is why he will provide unlimited Starshield access to China.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    77 months ago

    lol, at least they’re asking nicely. they can “collectivize” the equipment if they decide it’s necessary

  • @EvilEyedPanda
    link
    07 months ago

    You never demand anything from an egotist, it’s like our politicians have no idea…