• @CeeBee
    link
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Awful title for a post.

    In case anyone else would like to know without having to click the link. It’s an article titled “28 years later” and is about the movie 28 Days Later and a potential sequel called 28 Years Later.

    • @CheemsOP
      link
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh ok.

      I’ve posted perhaps 10 things in total including this, since I started using reddit and now lemmy more than 10 years ago. So this criticism has been helpful, I hope you find the new title to be more to your liking.

      • @CeeBee
        link
        11 year ago

        No worries. A better title might be something like:

        “MovieWeb article on a potential to 28 Days Later”

        It’s best to be descriptive and concise. Don’t make it vague or try to be clever to entice someone by piquing their interest.

        The point of posting these links to sites like Lemmy/Reddit is to get past the click-baity stuff for each other.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Why not just “28 Years Later? 28 Days Later Director & Writer Tease Potential Third Installment”

      • @canthidium
        link
        11 year ago

        I don’t know what your title was before you edited, but the main thing I think you need now is punctuation. The words are just jumbled together and a little difficult to parse without reading a couple times. I’d just add a couple words to clarify, quotes, capitalization, and commas mostly:

        Talks have started about “28 Years Later”, a third installment to the “28 Days/Weeks” movies.