• @bitwaba
      link
      128 months ago

      It’s the old adage:

      If something is free, you’re the product not the customer.

      • @ccunning
        link
        18 months ago

        Right. The users are the product. What do you think happens when a vendor runs out of product?

        Users matter.

        • @bitwaba
          link
          18 months ago

          only if they earn money. otherwise they’re something you can sell to an advertiser - and that’s the only value they have.

  • @Mr_Blott
    link
    848 months ago

    I dunno about you, but if I click a link and it says they’re going to share my info with 164 ‘vendors’, then only shows an “accept” button, they can fuck right off and I’ll never go to their website again

    It’s 2024, that shit’s illegal in the modern world

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        148 months ago

        See that copyright at the bottom? That’s why we don’t do this.

        This is how you get the relevant copyright holder to hit your lemmy instance with a DMCA takedown notice (or whatever the relevant jurisdiction’s legal equivalent is). I’m not saying I like it. I’m just saying that the Powers That Be will enforce that rule if they catch you, and it’s far less trouble for the people who are letting you use the server capacity of their lemmy instance if you just… don’t post copyrighted material that they’ll get dinged for.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            48 months ago

            That is the way to do it; let the archiver take the legal risk, that’s something they’re planning for

        • Isho'ye
          link
          fedilink
          08 months ago

          @gravitas_deficiency @Blaze If they’re going to be a stickler about the “in any way” bit, guess it’s against the rules to simply view it?

          The browser makes a local copy in the cache. That’s how things work.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            118 months ago

            You miss the point.

            That post constitutes a mirrored copy of the article that was not authorized by the copyright holder. The copied text includes the bloody copyright. That’s practically begging for a legal nastygram if the admins leave that up.

            • Isho'ye
              link
              fedilink
              -18 months ago

              @gravitas_deficiency Geez, after over 35 years on the Internet, you think I’d learn to append an “/s” tag to things by now.

              I’ll leave a some here for future use.

              /s /s /s /s /s /s /s /s /s

      • @Mr_Blott
        link
        78 months ago

        Sounds like something I’m too European to worry about 😂

  • Hypx
    link
    fedilink
    528 months ago

    Reddit has never been a business capable of generating significant profit. It only exists because it was less monetized than the alternatives. By abandoning this philosophy, Reddit is guaranteed to be the next Digg.

  • @pivot_root
    link
    488 months ago

    The top comment is “Fuck spez.” Hah.

  • @DeVaolleysAdVocate
    link
    428 months ago

    sustained growth can’t succeed along with the surroundings. I would like to believe that gross mismanagement would lead to the downfall of this once super cool website but I also think twitter is a stupid idea so I’m a bad judge of what will get funding. I wonder how much of that funding is shell corporations from intelligence agencies harvesting user data and training computer models though too.

    • @CM400
      link
      88 months ago

      Letting the users have their way seems like a great way to harvest better quality data from the user base. Not that I’m in favor selling user data…

    • @douglasg14b
      link
      13
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Maybe in a few years.

      Right now we’re talking 0.0057% of the monthly active users. Lemmy likes to hype itself up a lot, but the market share is incredibly tiny, and likely will be for years to come. As a platform Lemmy would be incapable of handling that kind of scale, from both a software, design, hosting, logistics, cost, moderation, and community perspective.

      I’ll be here, but let’s check in each year on it. I’m guessing it will be a few before we either see accelerating growth, or Lemmy is upset by better designed federated social media software, or it’ll just be fragmented between dozens of competing platforms.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        108 months ago

        Honestly, I expect that the parts of the Web I enjoy spending time will be fragmented for the foreseeable future.

        Lemmy people are obsessed with growth but honestly I think there’s a trade-off that people are overlooking.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 months ago

          Yeah. I don’t get the obsession with growth. I get missing some communities you want to have (that you had on Reddit for instance) but then try to cultivate those communities instead of wanting general growth. General growth just will eventually just lead to low effort posting/commenting drowning out interesting posts/discussions.

          Also, if the platform is good it will grow anyway.

  • @Hobbes_Dent
    link
    138 months ago

    Yeah ok. The new reality it must face is as the temporarily inconvenienced Twitter that it’s been trying so hard to be.