• @gedaliyahM
    link
    942 months ago

    Aren’t all threesomes bisexual or homosexual? By definition? What does that word mean here?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      56
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No, not inherently. If the two same sex people dont engage in any sexual contact directly, its just a heteosexual threesome.

      Bisexual threesome is when everyone is having sex with everyone else.

      • @credo
        link
        52 months ago

        But I mean, for one person it’s not bisexual. Isn’t that just bisexual sex with a plus one?

        • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
          link
          92 months ago

          Would you consider and Eiffle Tower during a spit roast a bisexual act?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Isn’t that just bisexual sex with a plus one?

          Only if the bisexuals same sex partner is the their primary partner, and not the plus one.

          If not, I would call it a threesome, or to be more specific, a bisexual threesome.

          • @Zron
            link
            -142 months ago

            Are you going by “it’s not gay if it’s a three way” rules?

            Either all people are of one gender, in which case it’s homosexual. Or there’s some combination of genders. So for someone in a MFF or FFM threesome, there is an element of bisexuality no matter what way you look at it.

            • @throbbing_banjo
              link
              21
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Straight guy in an open marriage here. Have never engaged in sex with another man, have had plenty of mfm threesomes. Two men fucking the same woman at the same time are not fucking each other.

              The transitive property does not apply to intercourse.

              • @afraid_of_zombies
                link
                32 months ago

                The transitive property does not apply to intercourse.

                Tell me you are not an incubus without telling me.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              92 months ago

              there is an element of bisexuality no matter what way you look at it.

              Element of multi-gender participation, but if say two guys are both wishing the other guy wasn’t there, they never look at each other or come into contact… it’s not very bisexual, no?

              Wonder how much has been written about this…

              • @Zron
                link
                42 months ago

                I’m not going to assume your experiences, but I’m a mostly straight guy who’s had both FFM and MMF threesomes while I experimented with polyamory.

                I vastly preferred the FFM stuff, because boobies, but I did learn that I can find effeminate men attractive, if I couldn’t it would have never worked. If you’re really a person who can’t interact with someone of the same sex, then I really don’t think a threesome is viable.

                I’ve had threesomes end where the other dude just really wasn’t into it, and we all decided to call it off. If everyone isn’t having fun, then no one is.

            • @CoggyMcFee
              link
              32 months ago

              So for someone in a MFF or FFM threesome, there is an element of bisexuality no matter what way you look at it.

              What if you keep your eyes closed the whole time though?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                MFM is two straight guys, one lady. That is fun. I am straight so yes, that means I have done straight threesomes. Have also done some with bi guys, but it’s not a lot different from the perspective of the lady, maybe slightly more relaxed.

                FMF I don’t understand - I agree that is probably no fun unless the ladies are bi. But it’s entirely possible to have a good time with two straight guys.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Im just getting specific in a reply to the commentor above.

              A bisexual + “plus one” implies that the plus one is not the regular partner, and that if the “plus one” is not bisexual, i.e in this context engaging in sex with the same gender, then that implies the original couple is instead.

              So a threesomes is not a “bisexual, plus one” unless the couple is in a same sex relationship, i.e 2 men or 2 women who invite a 3rd of the opposite sex to bed.

              A threesome with an otherwise hetro couple who invites a 3rd of either gender to all have sex with is a bisexual threesome, but not a “bisexual, plus 1” situation. The same threesome where everyone engaged in only hetrosexual contact would just be a hetrosexual threesome.

              • @inb4_FoundTheVegan
                link
                2
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                😂 😂 😂

                The convoluted techincal logicistics of why it’s not gay and precisely when it does become so is silly. The answer is that yes, doing sexual acts with someone of the same sex/gender meets the common definition of being gay. But gay and straight are just words used to self identify. Humans are way dynamic than trying to cling to these arbitrary labels. Having a threesome has zero impact on you telling a potential partner that you are gay/straight because you’re interested in them.

                Labels are important and helpful, but we gotta remember they are just words that can’t define the sum of a human not accurately catch the essential essence of any single person. So it’s healthy to recognize their limitations, trying to precisely define what is and isn’t gay just feels like cope so you can keep calling yourself straight. Just do it, this doesn’t matter.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  82 months ago

                  The real point here the people discussing this seem to be missing is that it doesn’t matter what any of us consider to be gay. The members of Moms for Liberty would definitely not call this “normal” in terms of sexuality and would be against it if it were any other three people.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  4
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Im not concerned about “gay or not.” I personally think you have to physically interact with someone to have sex with them, but honestly dont care if someone considers all threesomes gay. “Be gay, do threesomes” would be a fine credo for the world.

                  Im just making a pedantic comment in reply to a pedantic comment.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You’re missing the point. That specific threesome can’t be 100% heterosexual. By definition.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 months ago

        No offense to anyone’s preference, assignment, or kinks… but yes. You have to at least be a little bit gay to bang someone with another of your same gender.

        • @jj4211
          link
          42 months ago

          You forgot about the golden rule… it’s not gay if it’s in a three way

    • Flying Squid
      link
      252 months ago

      Maybe, but pointing out that it isn’t heterosexual makes it look worse for those hypocritical puritanical fucks, so I’m fine with it.

    • @profdc9
      link
      122 months ago

      Yeah the pigeonhole principle here would seem to dictate that, or some principle involving holes anyways.

  • @WoahWoah
    link
    73
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Her robust and consensual sex life is perhaps the only thing I don’t find despicable about her.

    Edit: yes, y’all, the hypocrisy and allegations of non-consensual sex and the book burning and the attempt to takeover the k-12 system with Christian nationalism, etc, etc, etc is the stuff I do find despicable. Sheesh.

    • @Son_of_dad
      link
      132 months ago

      The original translation of “men are prohibited to lay down with man” is more akin to “men are prohibited from laying down with boys”

      So the only real verse in the Bible that mentions homosexuality is actually telling people to not be pedos

      • @afraid_of_zombies
        link
        42 months ago

        No.

        First off there are two passages in the O.T. that directly prescribe the death penalty for male homosexuality, not one like you said.

        Second neither one of which contain the Hebrew word for “boy”. Both use the words to describe a man.

        Third even if they somehow meant to write boy but didn’t in context it would still work out to mean man.

        Fourth the rest of the bible is completely consistent on this which is almost shocking given that it is consistent on so little. From Leviticus all the way to Paul, we got about a thousand years of different writers all saying the same thing on this one issue.

        Fifth even texts that didn’t make it it in the Bible (at least directly) like Enoth still go after it.

        Sixth the oldest commentaries all agree what the rules were about this.

        The abhramic faiths are on the text level homophobic. No amount of apologetics, or crappy translations, or recontextual work will change what they contain. When people or religions tell you what they are about believe them. And stop following these shit tier religions.

      • PhilMcGraw
        link
        English
        22 months ago

        What is your source for this? Sounds like something my religious grandma drops to justify all of the bad in that book.

        • @afraid_of_zombies
          link
          12 months ago

          I am betting the are misremembering a thing that was making the rounds claiming that Paul meant in one of his letters Romans chapter 1.

          It isn’t correct because

          A. He had a perfectly good Greek word for being a pedo and didn’t use it

          B. The passage is clear that it was consensual act he was condemning

          C. Who cares? We have two other letters (one granted is a forgery) where it is condemned

          Why can’t people just accept that these people were homophobic? They were. If you are from an Abrahamic faith your skydaddy is a homophobic piece of shit and so we’re the people who claim to speak for him. Stop praying to it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 months ago

      Technically the meaning behind the word sodomy was never recorded consistently through the ages so you can basically say it’s whatever you want and therefor the bible is against it. For example, maybe Felatio is Sodomy. Maybe non-metaphorically eating corndogs is Sodomy. Or both or neither.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 months ago

        The only thing we can say for sure is that daughters getting their father drunk and raping him to get pregnant probably didn’t happen in Sodom. It happened directly after by the only “good” people allowed to survive.

        • Liz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          That’s your reward for being good! You get to rape your dad and have his kid!

          • @afraid_of_zombies
            link
            02 months ago

            Sure. The Bible was written in Greek and Hebrew with some loan words from Aramaic and like 9 words or so, not related to this, from Latin.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -12 months ago

              You’re now arguing that the bible in Hebrew doesn’t mention sinning taking place in Sodom?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  02 months ago

                  Then by your argument, the bible contains no English words because it was written in hebrew and therefore any quotes from the bible not made directly in hebrew are false. Sodomy is directly the same in meaning as the Sin of Sodom as it has evolved from exactly that phrase and has kept it’s meaning consistently.

      • nocturne
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        deleted by creator

        If only this would happen to Christianity.

  • sebinspace
    link
    62
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Now Bridget, let’s be clear: you’re not being called out for being bi. That would be hypocritical. You’re being called out for being a hypocritical cunt yourself.

    Now kindly fuck off :3

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      192 months ago

      I’m reminded of Congressman Henry Hyde wrapping up the day’s House hearing on Presidental Blowjobs a bit early so he could run across town a boink his mistress.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    38
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “Investigators found numerous videos of the Republican couple having sex with other women”.

    I think the real news here is a republican was caught doing something besides full on gay sex for once.

    • @masquenox
      link
      162 months ago

      Or that any of it was consensual and the particpants was of consenting age.

      • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
        link
        22
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I mean, it all came to light because of a rape allegation. The investigation was what uncovered the entire thing, where they found tens of thousands of (potentially non-consensual) videos of their threesomes. And no, that number isn’t an exaggeration; Investigators found nearly 30k videos. So even the “consensual” part is dubious at best.

        The lady who accused him of rape only consented because she thought it was going to be a threesome. Then Bridget backed out, so the lady said she wasn’t interested anymore. But Christian still showed up and had sex with her while she was drunk.

      • @Hobbes_Dent
        link
        6
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        “In their PRIVATE PARTS.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      I misread “numerous” as “humorous” and was wondering what’s so funny about Republican lesbians. Are they stealing lemons?

  • @iAvicenna
    link
    372 months ago

    How is it that these people are almost always involved in things that they publicly shame

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      92 months ago

      People obsessed with power will do power-obsessed shit like this.

      They get off on it

    • @devbo
      link
      72 months ago

      Makes it more exciting?

      • @iAvicenna
        link
        62 months ago

        hmm quite possible, doubly wrapped in delicious taboo

    • mechoman444
      link
      32 months ago

      It’s some kind of cosmic law.

      All those anti gay asshats are as gay as everyone else.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart
    link
    332 months ago

    Imagine the alternative timeline when she isn’t a hypocrite and just has a tinder account to get some strange pussy?

  • @Juice64
    link
    322 months ago

    But how did her husband get her to do that? For research purposes of course 🤔

    • @jeffwOPM
      link
      122 months ago

      Step 1. Be bisexual

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 months ago

    They do realize they’d be able to have a lot more gay sex if they’d stop criminalizing gay sex right?

    • @Fedizen
      link
      15
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Their kink is punishing people for doing the things they enjoy. Legalization makes it feel like they’re not above the poors - taking all the fun and adrenaline out of it.

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        Remember in Fallout New Vegas when the White Glove Society specifically wnats a meat shortage so eating beef can stay a “Luxury”?

  • @p5yk0t1km1r4ge
    link
    142 months ago

    Christian Ziegler’s iPhone in the investigation and found 30,000 videos on it.

    Jesus. How does a phone even have that much storage? Cloud shit? Seriously though, God damn that’s a lot

    • @bamfic
      link
      English
      12 months ago

      short tik tok clips?

  • @voluble
    link
    82 months ago

    Anyone have a link to the actual police report? Asking for a friend.