I don’t know if there’s a place on Lemmy yet to post interesting charts/graphs, so I’ve just been dropping stuff here.

  • @Gigan
    link
    1423 days ago

    Average size of homes in selected EU countries and USA

    It’s nice when they tell you upfront that the data is cherry-picked

    • @jqubed
      link
      523 days ago

      Since England & Wales are highlighted I’m guessing this chart was made by a news outlet from England or Wales?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      323 days ago

      Also, a tiny percentage of the population in the US has 90% of the money lol

      Their ghastly giant homes skew the average upward

      How would it look if it included the amount of space each person has when they have to share accommodation because rent is unaffordable for a massive chunk of the population?

  • @Th3D3k0y
    link
    English
    11
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    The USA (3.797 mi^2 ) is almost the same size of all of Europe (4.077 mi^2 ) and less than half the population (333m vs 746m)

    Lots of space here, cheap land, big houses.

  • @ccunning
    link
    923 days ago

    245sqm ≈ 2637sqft for those of the Imperial persuasion…

    Having just moved from an 1100sqft(102sqm) home to an 1800sqft(167sqm) home, that just seems absurdly large to me.

    • @Gigan
      link
      623 days ago

      True, I wonder what the median is

      • @ccunning
        link
        123 days ago

        I wondered myself and briefly tried googling it. I didn’t find any sources I really trusted, but the answered I saw for median were very similar to average.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          That’s crazy, unless the count of houses has increased tremendously since the 80’s (it may have).

          Seeing a distribution would help. Also seeing the definitions.

          Then I’ve also seen a house double in size when you add heat to a basement and proper egress. Lots of houses built in the 50’s/60’s can double legal size this way, without altering the footprint. You can get 3000 sq ft on a typical suburban 1/3 acre lot doing this.

          • @jqubed
            link
            123 days ago

            I found these links that look useful from the St. Louis Fed and Census Bureau that look interesting; the Census in particular looks like they offer home construction data going back to the 1950s in Excel format. That could be interesting to play with.

            I do seem to remember articles about how many new homes have been built since especially the ’90s as interest rates came down, and how much larger houses started getting. Also anecdotally, apart from your example of finishing basements, I’ve noticed more and more older homes on desirable property being torn down and larger homes being built in their place, some of the old homes being as new as the 1980s and rarely even newer.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              123 days ago

              Thanks for the links, now I’ll be down the rabbit hole in excel!

              Yea, I’ve seen a LOT of properties bought for the full price just to raze it and build new.

              Interesting stuff.