Summary

1. Finkelstein’s strong condemnation of Kareem Khan reveals his disdain for those he perceives as tools of the West, suggesting a deep-rooted skepticism towards Western influence.
2. Finkelstein’s claim that the human rights and legal community pressured Khan highlights the potential external influences that may impact decision-making within international organizations.
3. The allegation of a man-made famine in Gaza, as documented by the UN, raises concerns about the humanitarian crisis and Israel’s role in exacerbating it.
4. Finkelstein’s reference to Article 3 of the genocide convention indicates his belief that Israel’s actions could potentially meet the criteria for complicity in genocide.
5. Finkelstein’s accusation of President Biden’s complicity in genocide, if Israel is found guilty, underscores the gravity of the situation and the responsibility he places on the US administration.