• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    59
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Good on them! This is how it’s supposed to work.
    Do the math on how much they made breaking the deal/law. Then round up and have them pay that back.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      169 months ago

      We’ll see how much they’re able to collect. Appellate courts love to throw settlements like this out or drastically shrink damages.

      It took 18 years for the Exxon Valdez case to reach a verdict. Another 2 years after that, the SCOTUS reduced damages from $2.5B to $500M

      “For the people who were harmed, they will recover approximately $15,000 apiece,” said David Frederick, who filed a friend of the court brief in the case for the state of Alaska. He called it “a pittance compared to the devastation the oil spill wreaked on their lives.”

      And, needless to say, the fine was not adjusted for inflation.

  • Monkey With A Shell
    link
    fedilink
    279 months ago

    Plus ongoing amounts right? Otherwise what’s the chances this wasn’t figured in as just a cost of business?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    259 months ago

    These tracks were laid illegally in the first place. The tribe should just go remove that shit from their land and tell the rail company to get fucked.

    • @some_designer_dude
      link
      English
      69 months ago

      $400M ought to fuck them somewhat, but I guess in oil bucks, it’s probably not going to sting for long…

  • @SuperEars
    link
    English
    49 months ago

    I learned the word “disgorge” from this article.