• @Reddfugee42
    link
    English
    39
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Jesus Christ google, how much money are you spending to foil 0.000034% of your user base

    • @Crashumbc
      link
      English
      236 months ago

      The purpose, is to keep it difficult enough that the “honest” person doesn’t get the idea to start doing it.

      Same concept as putting a lock on your front door. It’s not to stop thieves, it’s to stop the average person from getting the idea to “just take a quick look”.

      By occasional going after workarounds AND making it public news. Your average computer user thinks it’s not worth the hassle.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 months ago

        If they don’t want honest people considering it, maybe they shouldn’t raise the price by 80% in a single price change.

        I paid for YouTube premium when it was first available. They guaranteed the price would never change as I was a first adopter. Then they did. Then they did it again. And then again.

        Google can fuck off. They have all the money in the world and they need to extort the people who helped grow their business.

      • kora
        link
        fedilink
        English
        76 months ago

        Which they’ve shown they aren’t willing to do…

        Personally, YT premium is my only subscription I have, and wouldn’t really have any others if money wasn’t this tight. But I was paying before this recent anti blocker war, I prefer YT Music just because of the way it handles a bunch of the music remixed by seperate and probably not “official” artists. And with how much youtube I watch on mobile instead of my PC, messing with blocking wasn’t very appealing to me, since the jump from YTmusic to full premium is less than almost any streaming sub.

        But I have always watched/backgroundnoised a lot of youtube, so its not that much of pain. Realistically, this was bound to happen eventually, hosting that much content hasn’t really gone down in costs as quickly as most tech overhead. But its a fairly complex line item, not just hardware & facilities, but all the law office hours related to copyright log is an ongoing and probably still growing cost for them and since they are not Disney thats a real cost I’d imagine.

        As a side note, it just reminds me how shockingly unaware I am of how much they must value our personal data, that it only just now became worthwile to fight blockers with this much effort and PR/image depreciation.

      • yeehaw
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        Yeah but on one hand the price they want I’m not willing to pay, but if I could get it for less then I’d consider it.

          • yeehaw
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It’s only worth what people are willing to pay. Already have Spotify anyways and not a fan of googles app killing tactics, learned that the hard way a couple times.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                56 months ago

                Video content? YouTube’s made it all but impossible to compete with their free offerings, for the cost of server upkeep alone

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  16 months ago

                  How has YouTube made it impossible for another video hoster to allow free viewing with ads?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    176 months ago

    Luckily they can’t do this in the EU. As an EU-citizen, I have the right to subscribe in Romania, for example, and pay no more than a Romanian would.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    It sounds kinda illegal. Can Coca-cola stop me from going to Denmark to buy for danish prices and claim I have to pay Norwegian prices?

    It’s directly comparable to buying danish subscription and using the service from a danish exit. If my data originates in china and are vpn-ed to Denmark they have the same cost on providing me service as anyone else in Denmark

    Edit: I’ve never been to China, but it’s like really far away from Denmark.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    136 months ago

    I can watch Youtube without ads using an adblocker or NewPipe. Why anyone buys Premium is beyond me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      I don’t really understand who you are getting at here. Everyone I know uses this combined with regular ad blockers. Anyway, once they figure out how to properly inject ads into the stream blocking is going to get really hard.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        I would not pay anyway. This is a principled position after I was shown a fraudulent advertisement 10 times in one evening (which used children with cancer to manipulate emotions)

  • @Nino477
    link
    English
    46 months ago

    Oh there goes my back up plan for server side injection ads

  • @Aeri
    link
    English
    26 months ago

    I tried to get brazillian youtube premium or whatever and it just didn’t work.

    • @lemming741
      link
      English
      46 months ago

      I did a South American country once too but the payment processor has a snafu and it stopped working after the 2nd month. I just spun up a personal invidious VM and moved on with my life.

  • @FuryMaker
    link
    English
    16 months ago

    Isn’t a cheaper subscription better than no subscription Google?