• @Crackhappy
    link
    English
    333 days ago

    I was all up in arms until I was prevented from reading a very important article because I didn’t pay for a subscription up front.

    • @jeffwOPM
      link
      12
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Block cookies or use an ad-on that does. Wired has a weak paywall

      • @Crackhappy
        link
        English
        -14
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I have been on the internet before the world wide web was invented, and I still do not use an ad blocker. Not because I don’t understand why people use them, but because I refuse to subscribe to the world that needs them. Kinda why I am on Lemmy, and why I donate a lot of money to keep it going.

        EDIT for the younguns: Old man yells at sky.

        • @voracitude
          link
          42
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I dunno man, being born before automobiles wouldn’t exempt you from looking both ways before you cross the street when you live in a world where cars are commonplace 🤷‍♀️

          • @Crackhappy
            link
            English
            -43 days ago

            That’s some folksy wisdom I haven’t heard since the last time a horse neighed at me.

            • @mecfs
              link
              22 days ago

              Love your attitude

              • @Crackhappy
                link
                English
                32 days ago

                I love you, Random Internet Stranger!

        • @iopq
          link
          213 days ago

          I don’t wear a seatbelt because I don’t want to live in a world where people need them

          • @IsThisAnAI
            link
            -283 days ago
            1. imagine being crazy enough to think seatbelt and ad blockers would be a good comparison

            2. yep, let people do what they want with their own safety, progressives are basically creating fascists.

        • littleblue✨
          link
          133 days ago

          because I refuse to subscribe to the world that needs them.

          Can’t see that biting you in the ass, down the way.

          • @Crackhappy
            link
            English
            -133 days ago

            I will reply to this again, out of sheer obstinance. I’m not made of raw stupid. I have had defense in depth employed for 20 years, if someone had managed to penetrate past the outermost moat, then I would be concerned. That hasn’t happened yet. Until then, keep your opinions to yourself. you yahoo

        • Ace! _SL/S
          link
          fedilink
          11
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Except that ad blockers also provide protection against malware, phishing and tracking. Having no ad blocker on is like having a one night stand over and over again without ever using a condom. Might work out for years on end, until you finally get infected

          • @IsThisAnAI
            link
            -83 days ago

            Your analogies are insane 🤣

            I just can’t imagine being riled up and afraid enough any ads that you actually put them in the same category of STD.

            Gen z and millennial panic like folks being afraid of D&D.

          • @Crackhappy
            link
            English
            -23 days ago

            I am raw dogging the internet. Kablooooooooiue

            • @gedaliyahM
              link
              English
              33 days ago

              Not sure about all the downvotes. I am finding your curmudgeonly antics pretty entertaining. You keep doing you old friend!

              • @Crackhappy
                link
                English
                42 days ago

                Awwww I don’t mind the downvotes at all my friend. I’m hungry, and I eat them for breakfast. ;)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -20
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Oh no! And if this one internet person had just seen this article, the whole problem would have been solved.

      Forget the victims, look at how we as society have failed this specific internet person. Shame on us!

      /s

      You’r basically saying as loud and selfishly as you can that your protest of how shitty the internet is takes precedence over victims of actual sex crimes. Interesting, when you could have just been mildly frustrated and then moved along like the rest of us do.

      • skye
        link
        143 days ago

        Or maybe he’s saying the company’s desire for profits took precedence over allowing people to read actual sex crimes and be upset about it.

        Plus his first concern was the victims clearly, after having clicked the linka nd being blocked off from accessing it by a paywall. Maybe you should have taken your advice and moved along