I am toying with a new PC build and wanted to check how good new CPUs are compated to a bit older ones, and yeah cpu.userbenchmark have never been that good but usually you could get an idea by comparison.

Now it’s neanderthal name calling and blunt intel promotion, what’s happening??

  • Bezier
    link
    fedilink
    64
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    UserBenchmark is a joke. They aren’t just biased in a normal way, but rather they have an obsession on AMD and throw lots of weird insults like this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    453 months ago

    Userbenchmark have a long running grudge against AMD. I’m not sure why, but they therefore aren’t a trustworthy source.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      313 months ago

      Whoever operates user benchmark these days is not mentally stable. Like legitimately off the deep end. The amount of defensive projection and “my tribe is better than your tribe” bullshit they vomit out these days is so ridiculous that not even a paid shill would post 90% of it. It’s a basement dweller with no life trying to find something to be a part of.

      • @TriflingToad
        link
        23 months ago

        …or just someone who clicks the first link in Google aka probs >50% of ppl

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    443 months ago

    They’ve been full on unstable nonsense since the day Ryzen dropped.

    They immediately started playing games with their metric to make Intel win.

    • Semperverus
      link
      English
      103 months ago

      The lady doth protest too much it seems

  • AlphaOmega
    link
    English
    123 months ago

    Use passmark … no biases