• Brazil’s supreme court said Friday that it ordered funds to be moved from Starlink and X bank accounts to pay fines levied against Elon Musk’s social media venture.
  • Following the transfers, the court ordered that the seized bank accounts and assets of X and Starlink be unfrozen, saying there was no longer any need to keep them.
  • The use of X has been suspended in Brazil since late August.
  • The Pantser
    link
    English
    1232 months ago

    As it should be. Be a dick and not pay your fines the government will garnish your wages, just like the peasants. Billionaire gets no special treatment.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        122 months ago

        Certain people here really hate Media Bias Fact Checker in particular because they believe it’s biased in favor of neoliberalism.

        • @sensiblepuffin
          link
          English
          72 months ago

          Their "bias* ratings skew slightly to the left (e.g. in no universe is the AP left-center), and people have complained about positive ratings for pro-Israel news outlets.

  • @NOT_RICK
    link
    English
    -482 months ago

    As much as I loathe Elon, I don’t think it’s fair to fine SpaceX for something Twitter did. Now if they were fined because they refused to block Twitter that’s different

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      552 months ago

      All ISPs were required to block Twitter/X. Starlink was the only one that didn’t. They didn’t charge SpaceX because it belonged to Musk but because they violated the court order.

      • @NOT_RICK
        link
        English
        -112 months ago

        If that’s the case the first bullet point is pretty misleading. Don’t see a problem with a fine in that case

        • @Zorque
          link
          English
          242 months ago

          Sure, if only look at that one thing and go to zero lengths to understand context.

          Things aren’t misleading just because you want every detail spooned to you.

          • @NOT_RICK
            link
            English
            92 months ago

            There is nothing in this story that makes it clear that the fines were levied against SpaceX for refusing to block X. That is a lack of context

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Owned by the same person. So you hit the same person.

      All of it could have been avoided if that same person paid their fines instead of playing the crying rich baby.

      • @NOT_RICK
        link
        English
        42 months ago

        He only owns part of both which is why I think it’s messy. Then again if you are shareholder in one of his companies I guess you get what you deserve

        • @Jimmyeatsausage
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          Societal consequences obviously don’t motivate much of the investor class, but financial ones do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      I think every cent from that Nazi’s companies should be seized and he should be dropped off somewhere far away from shore.

      • [email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        As a taxpayer I would be happy to contribute to getting him a one way ticket off the planet.

    • @cheese_greater
      link
      English
      9
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Its important to pierce that veil, thats how ya get off