• Flying SquidOP
      link
      203 months ago

      That depends… if I tell him, “ass, gas or grass,” will he ask me if I mean Zyklon B?

  • @CluckN
    link
    513 months ago

    That reminds me of elephants that realized they could block sugar cane trucks on the road and started stealing from them.

    • @Noodle07
      link
      23 months ago

      Damn… Can’t blame em I would do it too

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    323 months ago

    Love it!

    Gotta point out that, though, that most primates don’t eat a lot of bananas. The species that really seems to love bananas is homo sapiens. I worked at a grocery store for several years, and saw the sales numbers. Bananas are the biggest seller, and it’s not even close. They outsell whole categories of other products.

    • @mipadaitu
      link
      English
      263 months ago

      Yeah, it’s crazy you never see bonobos at the grocery store!

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      103 months ago

      As a banana-hater, I have never felt closer to my fellow great apes.

    • @public_image_ltd
      link
      43 months ago

      Fun fact: In 1989 the people of Eastern Germany (also known as GDR or DDR) started a revolution because the communist government was unable to provide them with sufficient amounts of bananas.

  • @whotookkarl
    link
    183 months ago

    Classic gorilla heist mistake, always let them drive

    • @ripcord
      link
      43 months ago

      Wait, but doesn’t Max only have 4 fingers (ot 8)? Wtf is he jumping to 6

      Danged hyperkinetic rabbity thing

  • @stupidcasey
    link
    143 months ago

    NOW LISTEN UP! Do exactly what I say and I won’t throw my poop at you!

    Shhhhure, what would you have us do?

    Lemme hear you say 
    “This shit is bananas” 
    B-A-N-A-N-A-S 
    “This shit is bananas” 
    B-A-N-A-N-A-S

    Again! 
    “This shit is bananas” 
    B-A-N-A-N-A-S 
    “This shit is bananas” 
    B-A-N-A-N-A-S

  • Track_Shovel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I went to a national park and they had bison. I had the very awkward conversation about why bison are protected now, with my young children.

    Humans are awful

    E: I realize I’m very lost lmfao. This was supposed to be a reply to another post but I had too many tabs open.

    Fuck.

    A reminder that a sleep deprived brain is not your friend

    • @ripcord
      link
      53 months ago

      The humans that worked hard to get them protected and to make a significant comeback seem alright.

      • Track_Shovel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        Fair, but the restoration is a pittance compared to what the herds used to be like. Granted, I wouldn’t want to step out of my house and be trampled by a bison because there were so many of them, but still, it was a tremendous upset to a natural system, and systematic genocide to boot. Nothing much to like about how it all happened.

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          23 months ago

          I read an interesting hypothesis a few months ago that the vast herds of bison were actually due to indigenous Americans being killed off by disease due to European settlers. They were no longer managing the land, so the grasses took over and the bison population exploded.

          Obviously, there were still far more bison than there are today, but possibly not the massive herds of thousands that colonists reported seeing on their way west.

          • Track_Shovel
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            That’s an incorrect hypothesis. Tall grass prairie, while definitely manipulated by indigenous people, doesn’t really require management; it’s the climax community for the biome. Further, fringe areas, like parkland, actually encroach on grasslands, not the other way around.

            Grasses are disturbance specialists, and prairie has a natural and short fire cycle that maintains this disturbance. Take away the disturbance and you get woody species coming in on the fringe areas. In this regard, First Nations would burn parkland to create more area for grassland. If their population were declining, the lack of management would result in less bison habitat, not more.

            E: I’m hilariously lost with the original comment - everyone point and laugh please. Lmao.

            • @finitebanjo
              link
              13 months ago

              Praires absolutely do require management. Floods and fires can and do lead to critical endangerment of plants and animals.

              Overgrazing wildlife also need to be controlled with predators who in turn often need to be contained to prevemt damage to human settlements or overpopulation leading to periods of death and disease for the animals.

              In theory if you have well suited animals to fill each role, wide open replacement habitats for migrating to in emergency, and no invasive pest problems; it could be self sufficient, but thats pretty much never going to be the case.

              • Track_Shovel
                link
                fedilink
                English
                13 months ago

                I disagree.

                Floods and fire can impact ecosystem composition at a local or regional scale, but these components are entirely necessary for ecosystem renewal and diversity. As parts of an ecosystem are disturbed, it opens niche space for early seral plants. Fire cycles can vary substantially even grasslands.

                The reason these systems need human management now is because they have been highly disturbed, and the whole system is out of whack. Roughly 2-5% of the tall grass prairie remains. The overgrazing and invasive pests/plants issue you touch on is anthropogenic in origin, not so much in undisturbed systems.

  • Rob T Firefly
    link
    English
    43 months ago

    And that’s how the Kong Banana Hoard got started.