History did not start on 7 October. But as the world stops to mourn it will for ever be a reminder of whose lives matter.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 month ago

    Really need to figure out how to filter keywords in Lemmy. I swear every second article I see is a variation of, 'WAI IS NO1 TALKING ABOUT ISRAEL!?!?!?"

  • @Linkerbaan
    link
    02 months ago

    Excuse me ma’am this article is hurting Holocaust Harris’ election chances please condemn Khamas right now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      252 months ago

      Why do you think Hamas are the good guys? What conceivable quality do you like about them?

      Who are you talking to? The author of the article literally said “I condemn Hamas” three times in the second paragraph.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -452 months ago

        You expect me to read obvious propaganda? It’s just Palestine playing the victim. Again. Because they’re cowardly bastards.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          282 months ago

          Yes, I do expect people to read articles before responding to them. What is the point of using discussion-based social media if you’re not here for an educated discussion on the topic? If you want to have a partisan screaming match just use Twitter.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            202 months ago

            I wouldn’t bother engaging. They’re not commenting in good faith, they’re just trying to annoy us and waste our time.

        • Zagorath
          link
          fedilink
          152 months ago

          Palestine playing the victim

          Umm, yes? Because they literally are the victim? Of an active genocide that started in October last year, and of apartheid and colonisation that has been going on for decades.

          Until Israel goes back to the 1949 borders at least (realistically, that leaves the Gaza strip insanely restricted, and the UN’s 1947 plan for Gaza was so much better), and leaves Palestine alone and punishes Israeli settlers, while ceasing treating Palestinian Israelis as second-class citizens, Israel will remain by far the worse party in this scenario.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Idk that script was really convincing. I now think that little baby Hind deserved to die, along with all those other kids. She lived in an ethno state so, what were the Israelis to do besides ruthlessly murder her?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          As we all know, the Warsaw ghetto was an ethnostate, that had to go. The slums still being bombed to the south of Beirut, the thuds which have kept me up all night? Overwhelmingly Shia Muslim. That’s right folks, another ethnostate that needs to be destroyed. By the IDF which is definitely not the arm of an ethnostate.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          122 months ago

          OK now you’re just straight up trolling. Good luck with that. I don’t think anyone around here is naive enough to not see through your rage baiting.

          • @PiousAgnostic
            link
            -22 months ago

            Genocide seems like a strange word to keep throwing around. According to Palestinian health officials 42,000 people died. And Palestinian’s population is like 5 million.

            42000 dead is awful. But it’s less than 1% of 1% of the population. If Isreal is trying to eliminate all of them, it’ll take 1000’s of years at this rate.

            • @Keeponstalin
              link
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              You are ignoring a significant amount to rationalize this as not an act of genocide

              It’s well-known what the Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said on 9th of October declaring a complete siege on Gaza, cutting off water, food, fuel, stating that “We’re fighting human animals,” and we will react “accordingly.” He also said that “We will eliminate everything.” We know that Israeli army spokesperson Daniel Hagari, for example, acknowledged wanton destruction and said explicitly, “The emphasis on damage and not on accuracy.” So we’re seeing the special intent on full display. And really, I have to say, if this is not special intent to commit genocide, I really don’t know what is.

              So, when we look at the actions taken, the dropping of thousands and thousands of bombs in a couple of days, including phosphorus bombs, as we heard, on one of the most densely populated areas around the world, together with these proclamations of intent, this indeed constitutes genocidal killing, which is the first act, according to the convention, of genocide. And Israel, I must say, is also perpetrating act number two and three — that is, causing serious bodily or mental harm, and creating condition designed to bring about the destruction of the group by cutting off water, food, supply of energy, bombing hospitals, ordering the fast evictions of hospitals, which the World Health Organization has declared to be, quote, “a death sentence.” So, we’re seeing the combination of genocidal acts with special intent. This is indeed a textbook case of genocide.

              • third source under Genocide

              Euro-Med Monitor’s death count differs from that reported by the Gaza Ministry of Health — which currently stands at roughly 42,000 — as it accounts for reports by the human rights groups’ field team. But the true death toll is likely to be far, far higher; estimates from health experts have ranged from 100,000 to over 330,000, or about 15 percent of Gaza’s population.

              In its over 100-page report, Euro-Med Monitor lays out some of the worst atrocities carried out by Israeli forces over the past year. It details the “systematic acts of genocide committed in Gaza, such as the targeted killing of civilians in homes, shelters, displacement camps, and humanitarian-declared zones,” and too many other examples to list.

              Read the full report here

              • @PiousAgnostic
                link
                02 months ago

                I mean you can down vote me, then throw a wall of text at me that no one is going to read. But it doesn’t change the reality.

                40 some thousand dead out of a population 5 million people. War is truly fucked up. We don’t have to change the definition of Genocide to try and make a point. It makes the argument sound fake. Like you want to force a response for fiction.

                • @Keeponstalin
                  link
                  12 months ago

                  If you looked at the report, you would see exactly how it fits the international definition of genocide. The point of these definitions is to prevent genocide before it gets to the kind of scale we have seen in the past.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        42 months ago

        On October 7th ~1,200 Israeli civilians were killed,

        No. 1139 people were killed, 373 of which were military or security personnel. Nobody really talks about what exactly happened on October 7th anymore, but the idea that Hamas and other groups entered, killed a bunch of civilians and left does nothing but help Israel.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            But the majority of people they killed were civilians.

            That gets us into the whole crossfire and Israeli friendly fire thing, but that’s not really what I’m trying to say. I’m just trying to say that it’s not as simple as “Hamas did a very bad thing to Israel”; a good part of October the 7th was resistance against Israeli occupation (and a good part wasn’t, don’t get me wrong, but I’ve noticed that this fact gets forgotten because Israeli actions deserve condemnation either way).

              • NoneOfUrBusiness
                link
                fedilink
                32 months ago

                the attack on military targets can easily be justified as an act of war.

                Yeah that’s exactly what I was getting at. Not trying to defend the atrocities they committed (which are many), but at the start when they weren’t as obviously committing genocide Israel was trying to paint itself as an unambiguous victim and one of their strategies was to claim all the dead as civilians and deny that the attack had any military goals, so I wanted to correct the 1200 civilians figure.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      102 months ago

      What conceivable quality do you like about them?

      The facf they’re not committing genocide right now?