Elon Musk’s SpaceX achieved a significant milestone on Sunday by catching the massive booster stage from its Starship rocket in a pair of robotic arms as it fell back to the company’s launchpad in southern Texas.

The historic feat, which drew praise from astronauts and space experts, topped a successful fifth test flight for the uncrewed Starship, which blasted off from the Boca Chica starbase at 7.25am local time (1325 BST) on Sunday.

As the rocket’s 71-metre (233ft) Super Heavy booster separated 40 miles (65km) above the Earth, the upper stage pushed on to an altitude of nearly 90 miles, looping around the planet at 17,000 mph before splashing down in the Indian Ocean as planned.

  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    404 months ago

    A bit on the why:

    To SpaceX and Musk’s credit, whether the company’s second attempt at catching rockets goes as well as the first, some version of the massive ‘chopstick’ arms SpaceX is working on was likely going to be necessary just to rapidly turn around boosters and Starships – and do so regardless (within reason) of weather conditions. By replacing a tower crane with giant arms, SpaceX will hopefully be able to stack Starship on Super Heavy (and Super Heavy on the launch mount) even in the high winds that are almost always present on the South Texas Gulf Coast. If SpaceX can also reliably catch boosters with those arms, it could be a significant upgrade for the operations side of Starship reusability. For now, though, only time will tell.

    https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-starship-launch-tower-mechazilla-arm-installed/

  • Flying Squid
    link
    134 months ago

    Hold me in your giant metal arms and say sweet things to me…

  • @BilboBargains
    link
    74 months ago

    Incredible control. You can see the engine flares vectoring the force to move the vehicle into place and keep it vertical.

  • vvvvan
    link
    English
    24 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • @remer
    link
    14 months ago

    And they said it could be done

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
    link
    fedilink
    -24 months ago

    yeah chopstick catch was awesome. the explosion of the spaceship after “landing” in the water wasnt.

    the more people think sending some people to mars makes us interplanetary, the less people take action on climate change.

    just like you were duped with the boring company so there is no work on a railroad system.

    go eat a cybertruck.

    • @answersplease77
      link
      54 months ago

      Mars transformation to be Earth-like requires 100,000 years. By then we’d either have ended climate change already or it would have ended us

    • @kerrypacker
      link
      -14 months ago

      So what are you doing with your life that allows you to judge others so easily?

  • @9tr6gyp3
    link
    -414 months ago

    Ban these ozone hole-generating rockets

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      114 months ago

      It looks like SRBs and kerosene deplete ozone, but hydrogen doesn’t. I don’t see any research yet on methane effects, but it doesn’t produce a soot trail, so I’d guess it’d be more like hydrogen. Since starship uses methane and has an extremely efficient full flow engine, I think the effect on ozone would be extremely small.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          That is satellite reentry, nothing to do with rocket launches. Building satellites out of something other than aluminum solves the issue, but even with mega consolations the effect is not super significant.

          • @9tr6gyp3
            link
            -34 months ago

            What do you think all these launches are putting up there? Starlink mega constellation satellites maybe?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              44 months ago

              Getting a rocket like this would probably allow for satellite to be built with materials other than aluminum because the cost goes down per launch since the rocket is reusable and the payload is so high the cargo doesn’t have to be built as light as possible.

              • @9tr6gyp3
                link
                -14 months ago

                In the process, we probably permanently damage the atmosphere.