Archived link

The sudden order to remove the symbol of the cross from the roof and entrance of a village church in China’s Anhui province cited unspecified “safety” hazards.

The notice, issued in March, was a shock to the church in Yongqing, eastern China, which had reportedly passed official safety inspections for the cross on the roof five years ago. The second cross had stood at the door of the church for over 40 years without any security concerns.

[…]

Nicola Smith Asia Correspondent. Jenny Pan Related Topics

Xi Jinping, China, Christianity, Religion 

05 October 2024 2:00pm BST 98

Worshippers in a Roman Catholic church in China Worshippers in a Roman Catholic church in China Sally and Richard Greenhill/Alamy Stock Photo

The sudden order to remove the symbol of the cross from the roof and entrance of a village church in China’s Anhui province cited unspecified “safety” hazards.

The notice, issued in March, was a shock to the church in Yongqing, eastern China, which had reportedly passed official safety inspections for the cross on the roof five years ago. The second cross had stood at the door of the church for over 40 years without any security concerns.

ChinaAid, a US-based group that advocates for religious freedom in China, alleged the order had been made by the villagers’ committee with no legal basis, suggesting it may have originated with higher-level authorities who wanted to avoid international criticism. Party slogans and censorship

It was one of multiple examples of oppression cited in a report last week by the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), an agency that reviews violations of religious freedoms overseas and makes policy recommendations to the President and Congress.

In their effort to “exert total control” over religion and to “sinicise” Catholic and Protestant Christianity, the authorities have “ordered the removal of crosses from churches [and] replaced images of Jesus Christ or the Virgin Mary with pictures of President Xi Jinping,” the report said.

The Chinese government has also required “the display of CCP [Chinese Communist Party] slogans at the entrances of churches, censored religious texts, imposed CCP-approved religious materials, and instructed clergy to preach CCP ideology,” the USCIRF report said.

Its investigation pointed to a report from 2019 of a Catholic church in the eastern province of Jiangxi that was forced to replace a painting of the Virgin Mary with her child with one of President Xi.

[…]

  • @bamfic
    link
    English
    11 month ago

    Yeah but The Xi Jinping and Mao Zedong Chain doesn’t have the same ring to it

  • @RangerJosie
    link
    -161 month ago

    Good. That religion is a cancer.

    Look no farther than the US itself. It’s believers are insane. Cruel and spiteful. Better to excise it now and save yourself the inevitable trouble it will bring when it metastasizes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      121 month ago

      It isn’t a crackdown on “religion”, it’s a replacement of it with the religion of the party.

      • @RangerJosie
        link
        -101 month ago

        Which incidentally isn’t at all dissimilar to how this religion originally developed.

        Love the irony.

        Mao Died for Our Sins!

    • @BananaTrifleViolin
      link
      English
      101 month ago

      I’m no fan of religion but religious freedom goes hand in hand with freedom generally. It is no surprise to see China oppressing freedom of religion, but it is a surprise to see a (presumably) western atheist celebrate it.

      • @RangerJosie
        link
        -3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        And we’re back to that old debate.

        Tolerance of intolerance.

        We could circlejerk for days or just agree to disagree.

        This push is coming from a US based nonprofit. Which of course means its actually coming from the CIA. It’s meant to undermine the Chinese govt. Same as it always was. Were this organic growth not funded by the US state dept it might be tolerable. But it’s not. This is politics by other means. And this debate is an intended part of it. If the Party allows it to grow the US gains inroads. If they stamp it out they’re evil oppressive tyrants. Win win for the US.

        The US cannot win economically. And its afraid to try militarily. All the force projection we can muster doesn’t mean much in the face of a standing army as large as China has. So this is what they resort to.