- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Uggh. As somene who collects physical media this is devastating. Hoping other studios don’t follow suit.
You must log in or register to comment.
Also need to me that sanity is still kicking. That’s sad that Disney is finding physical sales not worth it. Makes sense though seeing we’re such a small market. Hopefully collectors will find a decent way to get media. But from a sustainability point of view it’s a good thing.
Yes my last local sanity store closed last year and they are online only now. I see my movie collection as a library these days! Streamers can remove content too easily sadly.
I’m gonna be real here, never bought any physical media after VHS, streaming is so much better.
You can always pirate it and burn a bluray if you wanna have a local backup, I understand it’s a bummer for collectors though
This is odd, although consistent with Disney strategy elsewhere. There have been recent reports that Disney was going reverse and bring back physical media.
For other content producers, physical media remains a significant source of revenue. NextTV reported that for 2022-2023 US physical media revenue (DVD & BlueRay discs) was $ 1.34 billion.
I quite enjoy having my favourite films and tv series on physical discs. Especially with streamers removing content with little/ no notice. Plus the internet in parts of australia can be an issue for streaming.
There have been recent reports that Disney was going reverse and bring back physical media
Could be similar to the “vault” strategy. Make physical copies scarce then drip feed us limited edition releases.
I would expect Disney to use the vault strategy of intermittent availability again.
The idea of getting rid of all physical media sales was to drive people to its streaming platforms. (Netflix has done the same.)
However, as no streamer can credibly commit to keeping everything from its library actively available, and there are tax structures incenting content producers to pull IP out of circulation, this isn’t a viable solution for anyone who wants to ensure future access to view a specific production.
If they don’t want individuals downloading and cutting their own discs or maintaining other privately created storage for personal use, they will need to offer physical media - at least intermittently. It hasn’t gone to court yet as far as I know, but I can’t see the courts upholding DRM against a personal use copy when there is no other way to get a permanent right of use.
