• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    134 seconds ago

    Do the voting machines even have the hardware to connect to the internet? Also if the software was modified it should be possible to pull an image from a compromised machine to compare it to the official version of the software.

    I don’t see any evidence being presented here, just theories of how fraud could have happened which is the same way I felt when people cried foul in 2020. Theories without evidence.

    • @EndlessApolloOP
      link
      English
      -24 hours ago

      “misleading” but still way more bullet ballots than there should be. Most of this is admittedly a hypothesis on what exactly the data means/how it happened, but that data can’t be ignored just bc he was slightly off

  • @Passerby6497
    link
    English
    -21 hour ago

    Oh cool, we’re doing 2020 but blue.

    • @EndlessApolloOP
      link
      English
      41 hour ago

      Pointing out super suspicious things about the election is not comparable to denying the results with literally no evidence

      • @Passerby6497
        link
        English
        01 hour ago

        Yeah, you’re just using a misleading source to push a supposition. So much better. Next tell me that you’re ‘just asking questions’ about the election.

    • @EndlessApolloOP
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Around 1%. The numbers reported here and corrected by Snopes are a lot higher than that

      Edit fixed a typo