The law will make platforms including TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat, Reddit, X and Instagram liable for fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for systemic failures to prevent children younger than 16 from holding accounts.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    17 hours ago

    Meet me at the bar for drinks, at the government licensed dispensary for controlled substances, or at the club for a good time… for age-verification purposes, obviously.

  • Quokka
    link
    fedilink
    711 hours ago

    Really interested to know how this is going to work with say running a Lemmy instance.

  • @Twoafros
    link
    1212 hours ago

    This seems like a good thing. To repeat what someone on here said, even if its not fully enforceable by the companies, it will be good way for parents to prevent their kids from being hooked on socials at a young age

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      510 hours ago

      Can you please send a picture of your ID to lemmy.world admins so that we can make sure you are not a 15 years old australian kid?

      • .Donuts
        link
        59 hours ago

        Platforms would not be allowed to compel users to provide government-issued identity documents including passports or driver’s licenses, nor could they demand digital identification through a government system.

        So no, ain’t gonna happen.

          • .Donuts
            link
            49 hours ago

            Wouldn’t this:

            nor could they demand digital identification through a government system.

            Prevent that from being possible? I realize you’re sarcastically describing a dystopian solution but the law seems to be pretty clear in terms of how government ID can’t be used.

    • oce 🐆
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      The platforms have one year to work out how they could implement the ban before penalties are enforced. … Platforms would not be allowed to compel users to provide government-issued identity documents including passports or driver’s licenses, nor could they demand digital identification through a government system.

      Magic apparently, they just passed the law without providing any solution.

      • atro_city
        link
        fedilink
        44 hours ago

        nor could they demand digital identification through a government system

        That makes no sense at all. It’s the only sane option: “hey, user xyz here wants to use our website, please tell us if they’re allowed to” and leave it up to the government, who has all the data, to answer that. What else can they provide? A blood sample to determine “biological age” or something?

      • VodkaSolution
        link
        fedilink
        511 hours ago

        They could try and fail, then appeal the law, or they can appeal the law before trying and failing. If it was, let’s say Italy, it would be normal: an unforceable law nobody cares about, unless a couple of times per year with big fines and media coverage

  • @IsThisAnAI
    link
    612 hours ago

    Pants on head and on fire top tier implementation and plan.

    Just fucking stupid.