• Theo
    link
    English
    253 days ago

    Man, I haven’t had a MAD subscription in ages. I didn’t realize they were still in print. Lol

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      29
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I don’t think this is real. If you search up the issue number you’ll see the real version. It’s also from 1974.

      • @MeatsOfRage
        link
        173 days ago

        So did someone make this with AI 🤔

        • @lunarul
          link
          82 days ago

          No, someone took an existing painting and modified it with copy/paste to show two middle fingers. Which is also ironic, given the message they’re trying to send.

      • @Ledivin
        link
        9
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Its not real.

        originally published

        MAD #166, Apr 1974

        lol yeah, otherwise MAD was WAAAAY ahead of its time 😂

        EDIT: huh, does lemmy not support nested quotes or am I just dumb

        • Tlaloc_Temporal
          link
          fedilink
          12 days ago

          I can see the different levels of quote, but there’s also spaces between them. Too many line breaks maybe?

          Your reader might not support nested quotes though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          43 days ago

          That part isn’t on the original cover. Is this a real foldout from a recent MAD issue that is an updated version of the 1974 cover?

      • Theo
        link
        English
        33 days ago

        Yea I wondered that after I posted my comment but I wondered if it was a joke issue or something. A lot of the issues I had growing up had a front cover and a back one that would work if you flipped it the right way that was an alternative or a joke cover.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 days ago

          Hmm the original doesn’t have that bit in the bottom right about the original concept. Is this a real MAD foldout based on an old cover but updated for the current hot topic?

    • Lem Jukes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 days ago

      I guess? But, how do you think the text part of text-to-image creation works?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -23 days ago

    I didn’t have much respect for MAD magazine to start with, always seemed to be generic boomer humour from what I’ve seen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 days ago

      At one point that generic boomer humor was new and cutting edge. It’s an old magazine with their heyday in the 70’s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I don’t like to call it boomer humor. That shit was funny in the 90s. For better or worse, it wasn’t the jokes that changed, it was our reaction to it.

      Thinking specifically of things like “Miss Swan”, “The ambiguously gay duo”, and “Pat”. Although I think only one of those was MAD. Still, we (as in the cisfolk, at least) thought it was funny enough at the time for it to keep getting aired.

      It’s boomer humor now because our sense of humor matured and adapted…and theirs didn’t.