cross-posted from: https://kbin.projectsegfau.lt/m/[email protected]/t/19913

Hi! 👋 Here’s our #introduction. We’re BBC Research & Development; we explore and test new technology to discover how the BBC can best make use of it in the future. For 100 years our engineers have been at the forefront of developments in broadcasting. We’re now researching how everyone could get TV & radio via the internet – along with all the flexibility and creativity that brings. 5G, AI, next-gen audio, UHD, personal data… we are investigating all these – and more! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzztGFXYR1Y

    • 001100 010010
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Breaking News: Fox News has defederated NPR, PBS, BBC, NYT, Washington Post, The Associated Press, CNN, MSNBC, and various other mastodon instances run by what they deem as “the liberal woke media”. MSNBC defederates Fox News in retaliation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        I know you’re joking but it wouldn’t make much difference to users if news organisations defederated from each other, most users will be on 3rd party instances.

        • Ech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          You know a large portion of the FOX audience would only use their echo chamber of an instance.

          • Matt
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            These sorts of instances are private - you can’t sign up to them, only the new organizations post on them.

            • Ech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Where is it written that a corporate instance has to be private? Just because this one is doesn’t mean every single one would be.

        • @Dark_Blade
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          It would be funny to watch though

  • GreatAlbatrossM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 year ago

    This is great to see, and I’m happy to see it’s R&D doing it, they’re definitely the right department to be trying things out.

    It’s nice to see the .bbc tld getting some use too! After a flurry following it being granted, they seemed to take down all the .bbc sites.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    We’re now researching how everyone could get TV & radio via the internet

    We’ve all been doing this for years already.

    We’re now working hard to get TV License tax added to your home internet bills

    FTFY

  • @Hotdogman
    link
    English
    111 year ago

    Yup. Just need to double check the correct instance when open up an article at work or in public. Opening the wrong BBC instance would make things really awkward.

    • Kara
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      This morning I looked at the trending tab of my instance, and was pretty confused when #bbc was the first result. Glad that curiosity got the best of me though

  • @seacocker
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    This is great. I assume they’ll hope to federate with Threads, but I’m happy to follow them from Mastodon.

  • Wren
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    I’ve yet to dabble in Mastodon, but this makes me want to properly check it out. Seems like it’s only a matter of time before more big names start following suit

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Definitely give it a try, although I would recommend Calckey/FireFish over Mastodon - it has more features.

    • roldyclark
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Mastodon etc is def the heart of the fediverse. I never used twitter, but I love Mastodon.

  • Ignacio
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    In case someone wants to pay a visit to that instance, its name is social.bbc (neither bbc.social nor bcc.social, as it appears on that crosspost).

      • Ignacio
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Yes, now it’s corrected. But when I wrote my first comment, it appeared as bcc.social.

      • Chaotic Entropy
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean… the fact that elements within the BBC covered up the activities of Saville isn’t really disputable. That’s not a conspiracy theory, it’s just a crushing reality. Best case scenario, the BBC just negligently dropped the ball as an organisation for decades and that just specific individuals swept it under the rug and avoided detection. Whether that tarnishes the entire the entire organisation forever varies based on opinion.

    • HipPriest
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      I don’t think the IT R&D team had that much to do with Savile. And you don’t either.