• @crypticthree
    link
    201 year ago

    That curve should be significantly more parabolic

    • @hairinmybellybuttOPM
      link
      Français
      -71 year ago

      even if it’s parabolic, there is more surface on such curve where the middle class are, not around the ultra rich

      the ultra rich should be eaten, but there are too few of them, so they are not enough to really increase total emission of the US, the problem is normal citizens with cars and air traffic and beef.

      sorry!

      • @crypticthree
        link
        61 year ago

        Well I don’t have a car, but heavy industry is the leading source of green house gas

  • @MoonshineDegreaser
    link
    141 year ago

    Yup. This logic solves all the problems.

    Hey 331 million Americans! Stop whining because 26 million millionares make your country the richest country in the world. The 305 million are just dramatic

  • @ConfidentLonely
    link
    91 year ago

    I am one of the poorer people in Germany, so at the very lower end. I am still pretty happy to be here because my lifestyle is quite better than in most of the other world. But I don’t see where I could make any bigger changes anymore.

    • I don’t drive (Fuck Cars!)
    • I do not fly
    • I eat near to none meat
    • When I travel, I travel only inside Germany with trains
    • I try to work in a field that helps the public transportation

    And so on. I understand the point you are trying to make. But for me it seems like the good old, you as a person are a problem! Not the industry, the policy makers and the fucking rich people with private planes.

    Don’t get me wrong here, I still see how entitled I am and that I can still change some small things… But sadly, that won’t save the world

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    51 year ago

    The corporation on top is to blame for the emissions of those below it, by pushing what they sell.