• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    I find it stressful enough doing an update on a remote server (where there’s someone in support who can reboot the box if it all goes wrong). It’s got to be something else to send commands to a spacecraft that’s now light hours away. It’s not just that you can’t exactly go out and troubleshoot the hardware, it’s also that the ping time is rather extreme so you won’t know for hours if you’ve screwed up or not!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Voyager 2 is programmed to reset its orientation multiple times each year to keep its antenna pointing at Earth. The next reset is due on 15 October, which Nasa says “should enable communication to resume”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    You have to appreciate the resilience of the design, though, it says the probe has an automatic reset every few months so it will hopefully recover in October when the next reset occurs

    • Big P
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Imagine executing the command, immediately realising you fucked up and having to wait 36 hours for the response back from the probe

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I’ve never pushed bad code to production. None of my unit tests fail*.

      * I don’t ever write unit tests

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -42 years ago

    If the probe is finally dead i.e. we can no longer communicate with it, I feel like it would be a fittingly ignoble end.