Hi. This post was flagged as “child sexualisation”. I know that it’s a satire about Yukari saying she’s 17, while it’s obviously not true. On the other hand it’s rated as
Sensitiveon danbooru (I can guess why it’s rated as such), so she might be a bit sexualised here and the fact that she’s labeled here as 17yo is kinda sus 📮. Tho I don’t have a strong opinion here. What do you think?I mean the entire joke is we know she is much older than 17, and even with the “oh, this 5 year old that looks 5 is actually 1000!” stuff that goes on in anime all the time, she looks older than 17 in this picture too.
Hi, I didn’t expect this :) If we want to be extra careful about minor and sexualisation, we should indeed take the lowest of the “apparent” and “paper” ages.
Here, Yukari is obviously old on both images, and the only thing that might hint at her being a minor is the 17 in the left legend. What if I edit the image to bar the 17 and have 18 written instead? The joke with 17 is still present, but the actual info from a visitor point of view is that she’s 18, so we’re in the clear.
I also agree that her breast area can be considered one of the focus points of the image (among the legends and faces), which would fall into the sensitive rating according to the “images focused on the breasts or ass” danbooru guideline.
I can also simply flag the image as NSFW, which will attract the visitors clicking on purpose on NSFW content :)
Seems fair, I’m closing report. I’m more worried about folks disabling nsfw completely than those not clicking it tho. It doesn’t seems sensitive enough to me so let’s leave it as is.
@[email protected] thanks for response too
Hey, you tagged my other account! This is for modding [email protected], I initially replied to you on an ani.social account for modding a community there.
No problem!
deleted by creator
NGL, I thought they were the exact same pictures on both side at first, but they’re subtly not.
