You must log in or register to comment.
Wasn’t the second arrest over actual child porn?
I want to say it was. Something like paintings of young boys or something
I was curious so I checked: “Then, in 2002, he became the subject of even more scandal when police claimed they’d found dozens of child pornography images and memorabilia in his home.
He has insisted, however, that they were simply pieces of ‘historical art’ and that they were not ‘used for any kind of sexual purpose,’ insisting, ‘I may be weird, but I’m not a pedophile.’ “
Idk that kinda screams pedophile
Right? I feel like this is being ignored in all the mourning coverage.
Why wasn’t he charged if they found a bunch of physical child porn in his house then?
Hollywood? 🤷♂️
