• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -9
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Another W from getting rid of this shitty, overcomplicated, tax sucking, maintainance nightmare of a technology.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 days ago

        Yeah, it was such a great move to first switch to fossil fuels and then have the gas line that gives you cheap gas blow up.

    • @Womble
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I think it has more to do with the 15% downturn in German industrial output over the same timespan due to the reliance on Russian gas now having to be replaced with LNG.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Wrong. 2.02 billion m³ of the total 2.56 billion m³ reduction came from just nuclear powerplants. The rest of the energy sector still uses 6.59 billion m³ but considering there were barely any reactors still running in 2019 this is a massive reduction from just turning off those few reactors.

        • @Womble
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Ok, but thats becuase Germany is producing and using less energy, by about 15%. So it is hardly surprising that the water used in the energy sector is down by a similar amount. X happened and afterwards Y happened does not mean X is the cause of Y.