• geekwithsoul
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1924 hours ago

    Ahh, yes - the studio that own Star Trek has turned against diversity, equity, and inclusivity. I foresee no repercussions from that at all. /s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      618 hours ago

      Did you not see Picard? Apparently the future of humanity is a fascist, racist shit show that somehow became the opposite of Gene Roddenberry’s vision for the sake of, like, subverting expectations I guess? The Federation was openly racist against Romulans and enslaved androids even after episodes like Measure Of A Man grappled with the morality of such slavery. It’s a wonder they didn’t do a throw back episode where Picard goes back in time to try and prevent the kiss from TOS because of the damage it did to the future’s timeline or some shit. From “Infinite Diversity In Infinite Combinations” to “Romulans are garbage and deserved to have their sun go supernova” in a single episode. That show was wild for a Star Trek series.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    921 hours ago

    Additional info not mentioned in the article: paramount is trying to have a merger, and needs government approval, and skydance wants the trump lawsuit against CBS/60 minutes to be resolved before they attempt to merge. They are doing a big dance with the administration.

  • @regrub
    link
    271 day ago

    Go anti-woke, go broke? Guess it’s time to boycott paramount too

    • @besmtt
      link
      English
      318 hours ago

      You could pirate all their stuff instead 😈

    • Majorllama
      link
      -261 day ago

      You keep boycotting companies you aren’t gonna have clothing or a car or be able to look outside soon lol

      • @Sausagecat
        link
        131 day ago

        Paramount is in no way important enough to people that they can’t live without it. Just pirate their shit. They make up like 10% of the market share anyway.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        321 hours ago

        Imagine being so pathetic and helpless as to actually think that, LOL! What happened to that famed right-wing “rugged individualism?”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 day ago

    Wait. Hollywood doesn’t actually care about the causes it champions? But that would mean they are doing it just for relevance and money?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    151 day ago

    What is motivating all companies to remove DEI? Is there any law against it? As far as executive orders, they only apply to government workers.

      • @Bamboodpanda
        link
        518 hours ago

        The company I work for had a DEIB conference last week. They were asked if they were still moving forward. They said “We built this company on DEIB, of course we are sticking to our values.” I couldn’'t be more proud.

    • @apfelwoiSchoppen
      link
      7
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The blunt end of capitalism: cost savings. Fewer lines to justify on a P&L. They are just using presidential admin changes as cover. Without any sniff of a notion of any regulation, capitalism sees no ethical reasons for additonal cost in business. More profit is more important than people and inclusion.

  • @regrub
    link
    131 day ago

    I’m looking forward to all of these anti-DEI companies virtue-signalling when pride month comes in June

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      523 hours ago

      They will virtue signal by purposely not doing anything including pulling funding and support.

  • @credo
    link
    523 hours ago

    Sub cancelled. Reason added.