Summary

Jeff Bezos has directed The Washington Post to only publish opinions supporting free market economics, prompting criticism that he is using his ownership to shield pro-capitalist ideology.

This shift comes after past editorial interference, including blocking an endorsement of Kamala Harris.

Critics argue Bezos’s claim that pro-market views are “underserved” is absurd, given their dominance in major newspapers.

The move highlights concerns over billionaire control of media and the suppression of alternative economic perspectives, particularly those advocating for greater government intervention and worker rights.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Jeff bezos is a ceo, who gives a fuck what he has to say on the economy?

    If the topic were “how to exploit workers to become a billionaire” sure maybe he’d have some pointers.

    • @trolololol
      link
      212 hours ago

      Politicians. They will listen and act on whatever he wants.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    30
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    WaPo was independent. Now it’s compromised. Just remember that next time you read a WaPo article, is all.

  • @ChonkyOwlbear
    link
    111 day ago

    Open debate topic: what marinade is best for cooking billionaires?

  • ThePowerOfGeek
    link
    English
    81 day ago

    I see his transformation into Doctor Evil (both physically and psychologically) is continuing unabated.

    • @pdxfed
      link
      41 day ago

      Amazon bought the rights to the Bond series last week.

      The dude has a triple mansion private island called the “billionaire bunker”. Is a media magnate, one of the richest, most powerful people in the world. Has insane, blackmailable data on almost any person’s ourchase history. Sitting behind the president at inauguration. Brutal to his employees in their warehouses and elsewhere. You can’t get any more bond villain than that!

  • @anonymous111
    link
    -122 hours ago

    Genuine question: What is wrong with free markets? This is directly contradicting Trump tariffs.

    • @isles
      link
      English
      1020 hours ago

      Maybe free markets are better if everyone started at 0. But in free (unregulated) markets, the prime incentive is to convert public goods (the Commons) into private property, at the expense and loss of society. Our regulations are to force companies to be less evil against people with fewer resources.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        718 hours ago

        Adam Smith, the father of modern capitalism, was very clear that free markets had to be well regulated by definition otherwise they would tend towards monopolies and non productive rent seeking behaviors. Only a well regulated free market can remain stable and competitive in the long run.

        The capitalists aren’t even playing by their own playbook anymore they just want all the money and everyone else to die I guess.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          212 hours ago

          Of course they don’t. Free market (how theory imagines it) is not pro capitalism. Competition is counterproductive to the profit motive, which is why large corporations look to kill the competition whenever they can.

  • paraphrand
    link
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Gotta perpetuate that Capitalist Realism.