• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    What can you do? Declare the move constructor, but don’t implement it.

    This sounds like a solution that warrants a big huge comment or the next guy to refactor will remove it and break stuff…

    • caleb-vincent
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      That’s how we would have to do non-copyable classes before C++11. Older code bases are still filled with unimplemented copy constructors and assignment operators with comments. If you were extra thorough they’d also be private. PC Lint hated both of those tactics.

      • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        PC Lint

        PC-Lint is an abomination that belongs in the depths of hell anyway, it struggles a lot with modern C++/TMP.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      This is actually what I did. I declared it and left a comment to explain why it needed to be left unimplemented.