Update was from 3 days ago, I’m really hopeful ladybird could be a future browser option to help break the stranglehold chrome has over the market, while Mozilla is struggling to find meaningful direction.

It seems like an exciting project with monthly progress updates :) they keep chipping away at compatibility.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4020 hours ago

    I hope they can do it. Mozilla hasn’t fundamentally changed from where they were at least a year ago (re: their inability to clearly communicate policy “changes”), but the fact that they don’t seem to know what concerns their users and how to communicate in a way that doesn’t stoke their fears—it just makes them harder to work with and recommend.

    Hopefully Ladybird can inject some much-needed competition into browsers.

    • CrisOP
      link
      fedilink
      820 hours ago

      I definitely agree. They feel deeply confused about their audience and like they perpetually flounder trying to find a sustainable direction or future :/

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        420 hours ago

        Ootl, what happened with Mozilla ? I use Firefox and very happy with it so this sounds surprising

        • CrisOP
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          They recently announced terms of service that they (I think?) Partially walked back. But honestly it’s a longer term issue-

          Mozilla is dependent on Google giving them lots of money to be the default Firefox search engine, and anti-monopoly rulings in Europe may mean Google has to stop doing that, which would really jeopardize Mozilla’s financial sustainability

          The gecko engine is way behind on web standards, and while it generally gets the job done for average users, I’ve learned recently lots of devs don’t test their sites with it or support it not just because it’s a minority browser, but because it doesn’t support a lot of stuff and is hard to work with.

          Mozilla seems to believe their path forward financially is AI features. Which are very unpopular with a lot of the folks who follow Mozilla, even if implemented thoughtful, and seems like a dubious financial future given even huge companies like openai are struggling to make ai financially self sustaining.

          Add to it the privacy preserving ad tracking stuff they wanted as an alternative to cookies a while back, and the picture doesn’t really get better

          All of these are small things. The compatibility with web standards isn’t the end of the world for most users. A big bug was/is that firefox rendered gradients horrendously for like 12 years or something with the bug reports just sitting there, but most Foss nerds who use firefox don’t super care if a website’s gradient looks crappy. The features that chrome has but Firefox doesn’t aren’t dealbreakers for most users. The privacy preserving trackers or whatever they were called seemed at least relatively thoughtfully implemented from a privacy standpoint. AI could hypothetically be done in a way that isn’t totally shitty, and maybe possibly they could build a financial future out of it. The terms of service debacle could stop here and not devolve into actual enshitification.

          But it all culminates together in feeling like mozilla is out of touch with their core audience and has no real viable plan for staying afloat, sans google paying them shitloads of money to be the default browser engine. :/

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          919 hours ago

          In short, they’re trying to make much more money to pay the executives’ 7 figure salaries, and are giving up browser privacy to do so.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              And remember that Mozilla is supposed to be a non-profit.

              I don’t understand how it makes sense for a nonprofit to make it so profitable to their executives to manage it… why is that not regulated?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1518 hours ago

        Not if it ties the fork into specific licenses. The other issue is that the internet should not be dominated by two and a half engines (Safari’s being the half). It creates an environment where they can collude to force the direction of the internet, where they are potential single points of failure, or where they can force users into bad terms of service.

        Take this hypothetical: I make Super Browser (SB), but I fork it from Firefox (FF). SB looks and functions completely differently from FF, but it still uses FF’s Gecko engine to render the web. No matter what changes I make, I’m still at the mercy of Mozilla and their priorities.

        This leaves few choices for developers and users alike, and it doesn’t encourage the companies at the top to innovate. Because, what are people gonna do? Leave? For what alternative?

    • Marvelicious
      link
      fedilink
      219 hours ago

      Oh, I think they’re communicating just fine. They’re signalling the direction they plan to take and it’s not a good one.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1420 hours ago

    The pro-FOSS stance would be to get your communications off of being exclusively proprietary platforms. Developer & early adopter freedom & privacy matters—but instead they are choosing Discord & Microsoft GitHub as their only platforms.

    • CrisOP
      link
      fedilink
      1419 hours ago

      True, but I’m not one to let perfect be the enemy of good.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 hours ago

        We can & should demand at least gateways if not at least a single alternative. Considering they have funding, they can self-host to actually control a forum or chat room as well as a code mirror (even if just HTTP with no forge). Folks are also undervaluing how some users are banned from access to these US-based platforms under US sanctions.

      • kat
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        I mean, we gotta draw the line somewhere. Seems reasonable to not want official community discussions to happen in a proprietary platform. We got where we are with the internet because of complacency.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    918 hours ago

    I didn’t know they’d be able to tap into the Firefox profiling tools, that’s neat! Probably great data to have as they get into debugging of more complex websites.

    • CrisOP
      link
      fedilink
      221 hours ago

      Is that in the video or just your hope? If that’s the case I missed it, and that would be super exciting!

        • CrisOP
          link
          fedilink
          320 hours ago

          Aw, fuck yeah! I’m glad you mentioned it :)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            219 hours ago

            It’s in the video too! With this level of coverage and functionality it seems like a reasonable goal IMO

  • CrisOP
    link
    fedilink
    1022 hours ago

    The part with the progress graph compared to other browsers over time is especially cool!